Holy shit that makes it 10x funnier!

I tip my cap to you, PrayerWaxpaint

Bjork!

I know it’s not a word, but a name… still if you use it with ! I think it’s particularly funny. Like it’s an exclamation, or a warning.

More like I got to them.

Yeah right. Hey thanks, shill. How much are they paying you to troll around and peddle your propaganda? You know, if anything, we should thank you. Because once the crop analyses findings are published, showing how your underground labs have genetically modified the skub seeds to consume all the inferior strains, then you can stand there and claim to have no vested interest in the skub wars.

I bet you own your share of shares in the Skubfiber®™ bookbinding process.

You’re a disgrace to the name of Ferdinand J. M. Brambleskub IV, may his brain endure in cryogenic stasis for all eternity.

And the same social security number. It’s a weird genetic thing ;-)

It should be legal, but ONLY for use in venues such as carnivals, state fares, or dental offices. Never ever in tall buildings.

If it’s any comfort, it rarely happens.

No, Dylan Thomas.

Detox. Cool I’ll check it out. Thank you!

I haven’t tried because I don’t know exactly how to go about it. I said the ideas I think would conceivably work but I don’t know the specifics to make it happen.

What meds have you just tossed back with a bourbon chaser? You are the one going off the deep end, fella. I merely stated my opinion about something from a purely legal-reasoning perspective and this person got all in a huff and ranted at me - not comprehending what I had said. And now you’re doubling down on that person’s incredulity and outrage. And the sad part is that evidently neither of you have grasped my one very distinct point, and instead have inferred some huge argument in which I never partook.

Really folks, please stay off the really heavy substances when conversing online. You’re both acting like screaming petulant children. I suspect I’m older than you both combined, no surprise there.

Please just let this die. Nobody is making the effort to read thoroughly and ASK to understand what I had been saying, instead you continue with your incorrect assumptions and attack those assumptions. That’s called a straw man argument, and you both could fill a scarecrow field.

You are arguing from an emotional perspective, and also bulldozing in a handful of unrelated topics that you clearly need to rant about. I am not saying I necessarily disagree with you on the specifics, but I was commenting purely from a legal reasoning standpoint. That is a very specific and distinctive principle, or I should say, set thereof. I have heard your type of argument a thousand times, and I am not saying you are WRONG, but I am saying you are not speaking in terms of law, but that of emotional reaction.

It’s fine, I don’t want to argue with you… My initial comment was one kind of discussion, and you’re arguing an entirely different kind.

Most editing software can blur faces. Problem solved.

Agreed.

Yup.

OK see maybe you need to go to school and learn how law works. You can’t have punishments vary based on the merit of the victim.

Here it’s Target, a rich company, somewhere else it’s a private citizen being stolen from, or a small family business, or a charity. The punishment as a deterrent needs to be based on the act alone, and not your personal lack of sympathy for the victim.

Sorry but the real world doesn’t treat law the way you seem to think.

I don’t think they want to publicize every aspect, since this would likely give a distasteful kind of vibe. Doesn’t mean they don’t do it. I’m not saying they do, but not including it in an exposé is not exactly conclusive that it’s false. Am I making sense?

Yea it contributes to widen the conversation so, yeah not a direct answer, but it has value in this kind of forum. I’m cool with it.

If it’s consecutive incidents of the same transgression it think it’s seen as a spree, like one crime carried out in pieces. It makes sense from a legal reasoning point of view.

Not for nuthin’ but I’d subscribe to that channel!