It’s about as “abusive” as using a laser pointer to play with your cat. A behaviour I personally find repugnant, but one enjoyed by cat owners the world over.
I’m curious, why do you fund it repugnant?
It’s about as “abusive” as using a laser pointer to play with your cat. A behaviour I personally find repugnant, but one enjoyed by cat owners the world over.
I’m curious, why do you fund it repugnant?
You might get the impression that we are lol
A vegan bot; now I’ve seen it all.
UN isn’t a credible source
Did you really just “fake news” the UN? LOL!
I don’t get it. What’s the reference?
Yeah. Peggy Hill. She did a few videos before realizing it was for a fetish website. Hank was not amused.
I heard it’s antisemitic to think it’s bad to shoot food aid workers.
It would be hilarious to see Musk beat up spez.
“The owner of Elon Musk’s X Corp headquarters in San Francisco has dismissed a lawsuit that accused the social media platform of missing monthly rent payments totaling millions of dollars.”
Now I know how they make the Pintos N Cheese.
From the blog post:
“June 14, 2022”
“Updated Aug. 28, 2024”
“And starting in 2024, all our users can look forward to Firefox blocking even more third party cookies.”
Bigfoot has X-ray vision.
The email service says it was unable to appeal a Swiss court’s demand to log the IP address of a French climate advocate.
This weekend, news broke that the anonymous email service ProtonMail turned over a French climate activist’s IP address and browser fingerprint to Swiss authorities. The move seemed to contradict the company’s own privacy-focused policies, which as recently as last week stated, “By default, we do not keep any IP logs which can be linked to your anonymous email account.”
Edit: formatting
It’s probably tight enough for your needs. Unless you live in Switzerland or are breaking Swiss law, they’d need a really good reason to send your data anywhere.
Unless you’re a climate activist in France:
“The email service says it was unable to appeal a Swiss court’s demand to log the IP address of a French climate advocate.”
The solution is to call anyone who uses Twitter a Nazi apologist.
The solution is shame.
At first I thought, “Good idea.” But I worry that it might start to dilute the stigma of the term ‘Nazi.’ People might start thinking, “They call everyone a nazi sympathizer. It’s not a big deal.”
I’ve never heard that phrase before. What does it mean/reference?
Nothing would. They’re just going to keep repeating “fake news” and disregarding any and all proof.
“Age restriction should be 25. lmao”
Interesting. I never thought about it that way.
Do they get depressed when they can’t “catch” the dot? I’ve heard that can be an issue with long term usage. I don’t know if it’s true though.