Why do you assume it’s less shock value? I would argue the opposite
Why do you assume it’s less shock value? I would argue the opposite
Well I agree with the problem, but I don’t believe attacking art galleries is a solut. Why not spray paint a real estate firm?
You created your own argument here though, right? I can be an advocate for any of one million serious problems that our societies have. Should everyone go destroy art galleries? Housing crisis = art destruction? Unliveable minimal wage = art destruction? Car centric societies = art destruction? Local store increased prices = art destruction? You have to agree that at a certain point this becomes indistinguishable from vandalism.
At what level then is this threshold? Or do you propose a hierarchy of ideas, which are suitable to protest in an art gallery, versus those that aren’t?
Well luckily they didn’t win this time, narrowly but SPD won.
Don’t even try. These people are deluded. There’s no way for Israel to do anything. Israel could probably be invaded, its inhabitants massacred and they would still chant bullshit about that somehow being okay. How has so much of the left turned to unconditionally support the nazi-inspired muslim brotherhood is beyond me.
Lmao what an American comment. Bro it’s not just in Germany, it’s more like it’s only in the US
Women are you in the car park and the car is on the floor and the door is open
If you use numpy you could just take advantage of np.rot90 function to do the tilting for you:)
That is not a very productive generalisation, and I am sure you understand it
Look,I agree with everything you say in principle, but how are russian empire glorifiers = tankies? What you refer to as “tankies” quite literally killed the entire russian royal family.
Getting en passanted ? Just brick your opponents pipi, they legally cannot reject you bricking them
The gallery still has to be closed, has to dedicate cleaners, invest into security measures etc. Vandalism can be as simple as spitting on the street. But that’s not my point, in general.
My point is why mess with a place what has nothing to do with climate change, and not mess with places that absolutely do have something to do with it?