It will end up being analogous to Uber and Lyft, and neither helps reducing the amount of cars on the road.
Also it doesn’t respect robots.txt
(the file that tells bots whether or not a given page can be accessed) unlike most AI scrapping bots.
No you’re right, I can only buy the bundle. I was expecting the page to throw a 404.
Both Zero Dawn and Forbidden West have buttons to add to cart
Hum, they both show up to me in the EU.
Edit: on Epic Games the remaster shows up, not the original version; on Steam I can only buy the bundle with the Complete Edition and the Remaster.
It sure looks great, but I wished the trailer gave more information as to what we can expect feature-wise. The announcement blog post is pretty light on details (new graphics engine, laser scanned maps, improved physics and VR)
If you go for RAID, I would advise for software RAID rather than hardware (i.e provided by your motherboard or a physical car). Hardware RAID will lock you to the particular motherboard or RAID card, which would represent an additional hurdle when upgrading or replacing it.
I see Amazon is trying something else for their 2024 attrition strategy.
Apparently in France naming a Prime Minister of the party that won the last elections is a compromise in itself for the President, so I would start with that 😒
I thought for a moment that it was one cat next to a mirror, nice photo!
I feel like not everyone is conscious of these biases and we need to raise the awareness and try preventing for example HR people from buying AI-based screening software that has a strong bias that is not disclosed by their vendors (because why would you advertise that?)
Seems like not a bias by Al models themselves, rather a reflection of the source material.
That’s what is usually meant by AI bias: a bias in the material used to train the model that reflects in its behavior
The release dates are
Earlier this year, researchers from security firm Avast spotted a newer FudModule variant that bypassed key Windows defenses such as Endpoint Detection and Response, and Protected Process Light. Microsoft took six months after Avast privately reported the vulnerability to fix it, a delay that allowed Lazarus to continue exploiting it.
Dammit Microsoft, you only had one job!
There are multiple causes to its demise.
The big one was security (or lack thereof) as attackers would abuse plug-ins through NPAPI. I remember a time when every month had new 0-days exploiting a vulnerability in Flash.
The second one in my opinion, is the desire to standardize features in the browser. For example, reading DRM-protected content required Silverlight, which wasn’t supported on Linux. Most interactive games and some websites required Flash which had terrible performance issues. So it felt natural to provide these features directly in the browser without lock-in.
Which leads to your second question: I don’t think we will ever see the return to NPAPI or something similar. The browser ecosystem is vibrant and the W3C is keen to standardize newly needed features. The first example that comes to mind is WebAuthn: it has been integrated directly in the browsers when 10 years ago it would have been supported through NPAPI.
I meant add support to new robots other than Dreame. On Telegram he explicitly said he won’t support any new Roborock nor Ecovacs
The creator of EyeChat created some rather interesting websites on which I lost a good 30 minutes on 😅
AFAIK Hypfer (Valetudo maintainer) has no intention to support new robots other than Dreame
As a note, Dennis Giese —who is the co-author of the Defcon talk mentioned in the article— is also the author of Dustcloud, which is used as the basis of Valetudo. Though I’m not aware that Valetudo will ever support Ecovacs robots.
Parents, maybe? They are usually so concerned about children’s safety, whether that’s their kids or someone else’s.