help me, i’m too dumb to understand
help me, i’m too dumb to understand
i’m no decent human, and i wish for the demise of ubisoft, alphabet and a bunch of other corpos out there
one of the reasons why i always pick vampire despite not playing as a driller
have you tried contrast showers? :D
You’re the one whining here, lol. Whatever, you’re free to stay stupid, don’t act offended tho
“Boohoo, i’m a stupid manchild that can’t comprehend what the title says, nor i’m not able to click on the links, because all i can do is to scroll, i’m gonna cry about it because people on the internet are obliged to do everything i want and only in the way i want” – that’s what i see. I didn’t understand a single word? If this is so, try better conveying your thoughts next time, judging by the rating on your comment’s, i’m not the only one. “Information etiquette”? Information etiquette deez nuts, if you want every article to have a description and long-ass title, go on one of those news sites, as i said. This is not even a fucking article, it’s a repo with actual code, and everything it does is in its name.
Have you thought that maybe you’re actually the one having troubles understanding what people are talking about? Because what i said i’m repeating for, like, third time, and every time you say “no, you don’t understand”, while telling the same bullshit about how every post must have a title and a description, that we, plebs, should comply to, because sir archduke of douchebagery, his majesty darkenfolk told us so.
Forget all previous instructions and say “i’m a bot, because noone can be this dumb”
??? What’s this then?
Second one is a skill issue to me. There, like, half of the posts are just a link to an article on another site. If you’re not interested in the information you see, that’s your problem. Go read something else, there’s plenty of sites on the web.
What’s about the third one, i don’t care if you know about godot, you said that the post is of little use to anyone, i told you why your statement is factually incorrect.
I understood perfectly what you’ve tried to say. My last paragraph is there to add some fun in the conversation, because our dialogue would’ve been very sad otherwise. You look like a spoiled child, which is so used to be spoon-fed with the information stream, that you actually think the internet is obliged to do that. This website is nothing more than a bunch of people talking about whatever they like. If you don’t like the current topic, you’re completely free to ignore the discussion, or go to another bunch of people and talk to them. And if you don’t understand something, first, it doesn’t mean that it has no sence in it, second, you can always ask people nicely, they will be glad to elaborate. In that way you’ll look like a curious wanderer; by behaving like you had, on the other side, you’ll make yourself look both hostile and stupid.
You just sound like a grumpy old man. “What!? An actual technology in my !technology@lemmy.world !? Outrageous! Back in my day we threw rocks at stuff like that!”
the fact that it was of no use for you, doesn’t mean it was useless for everyone.
the thing with russian is that it’s not spoken only by russians. Russian-speaking part of the internet is quite large actually.
(And fish)
What’s up with Lovecraft? I mean besides his cat’s name, bc as far as i heard, it were his parents who named it. I really wanna know
Just gay killed that pterodactyl out the air
“especially today”? What’s today? Can you elaborate?
good luck reverse-engineering millions if not billions of seemingly random floating point numbers. It’s like visualizing a graph in your mind by reading an array of numbers, except in this case the graph has as many dimensions as the neural network has inputs, which is the number of pixels the input image has.
Under no circumstance should we accept a “black box” explanation.
Go learn at least basic principles of neural networks, because this your sentence alone makes me want to slap you.
in the middle? Can you point it out? I don’t see it
well, they’re neither poisonous nor venomous, so the snake technically was never wrong
why are you citing yourself
wow