I Suppose… If ya really wanted to get to the bottom of it… We could find someone… Someone who farms Ostriches

Yes, especially with no face shots. That being said, I think it’s brutally competitive these days. You are probably better off checking the beer money reddit sub if you are having trouble making ends meet and can’t find a proper job.

It’s to keep kids off the website and even with all that, there’s already been cases. I think they dont do enough tbh.

The kind that turns it into an other of microsofts pet toys.

He didn’t build those fireworks himself either. And guess who regulates fireworks and the materials needed to build them. Its a conspiracy all the way to the top. That’s right, you guessed it. J’Osama Biden.

DiCaprio has requested he be either cryogenically frozen for the rest of the century, or sent back in time a decade to the last time people loved one of his movies.

Oh wow, that is quite the zinger.

The general scene can do much more now. It’s a tool and silly to stick your head in the sand and pretend it doesn’t exist. Understandably, it brought up the bar for entry level work but it will bring up the quality and the sheer amount eventually.

All facets of gen ai are a real boon for things like indie video games and animations once you get past the constant pessimism. I’m insanely excited for llm driven npcs and things of that nature as well.

It also makes correcting documents a breeze work wise. I’d give a lot just for that tbh.

When someone calls you a nimrod, do you start going on about how the word “actually” means a great hunter?

Regardless of its root, the word luddite has a clear meaning. I find it hilarious the anti-ai bros wear it as a badge of honor, thinking they are somehow bringing the old meaning back when the current common one describes them exactly; someone who is stupidly against progress and new technologies.

I don’t either hut the alternative is much worst in my opinion. It would mean the algorithms are so advanced they are predicting conversations instead of listening to them.

“Ted, none of the parents in this neighboorhood seem to be getting presents, is it because they already have such big houses and don’t need anything?”

“Nope, his name is on the notty list, let me Google him…oh, he’s a Healthcare ceo”

“Damn, should we even be giving his kid a gift?”

“Might as well. If we don’t, his dad will just blame immigrants anyways. We don’t need to poison the nepo kid even more.”

Is that how luigi hurt himself?

The sad thing is there is currently a vibrant open source scene around generative ai. There is a strong media campaign against it, as to manipulate the general population so they clamor for a strengthening of copyrights laws.

This won’t lead to these tools disappearing, it will just force them behind pricey and censored subscription models while open source options wither and die.

They do indeed want to enslave us, and will do it with the help of people like OP.

basically no real use

"The horse is here to stay, but the automobile is only a novelty — a fad.”

Also, will you get mad at the next new industry? I highly doubt it.

As much as I think this is a great solution and should be written into law, the anti-ai crowd only asks it from one industry and it’s a clear sign of bias.

Not to mention that the big companies are literally doing it, either building new nuclear plants or restarting old ones. They aren’t the one holding green energy back, the oil cartel and their corrupt politicians are.

The radium paint one is particularly bad because they told the workers (mostly women) to give their brush a fine tip using their mouth.

I buy my chips directly from China when I can. The fact is, if I buy it from a distributor here, it comes from the same place but costs a stupid amount more. I’m talking about opamps that are 80 cents from China but 30 dollars on digikey.

The US has a greedy middle man issue. I think bringing up home grown production is good for security reasons but I know someone’s buddy is going to get all the profit and we won’t actually have competitive prices.

Making a prototype of something is bloody expensive already, even when dealing directly with China.

Reddit and newspapers selling their data preemptively has to do with LLMs. Can you clarify what scenario you are aiming for? It sounds like you want the courts to rule that AI companies need to ask each individual redditor if they can use his comments for training. I don’t see this happening personally.

Getty gives itself the right to license all photos uploaded and already trained a generative model on those btw.

They won’t need to, they will get it from Getty. All these websites have a ToS that make it very clear they can do whatever they want with what you upload. The courts will simply never side with the small time photographer who makes 50$ a month with his stock photos hosted on someone else’s website. The laws will be in favor of databrokers and the handful of big AI companies.

Anyone self hosting will simply not get a call. Journalists will keep the same salary while the newspaper’s owner gets a fat bonus. Even Reddit already sold it’s data for 60 million and none of that went anywhere but spezs coke fund.

If we can’t train on unlicensed data, there is no open-source scene. Even worse, AI stays but it becomes a monopoly in the hands of the few who can pay for the data.

Most of that data is owned and aggregated by entities such as record labels, Hollywood, Instagram, reddit, Getty, etc.

The field would still remain hyper competitive for artists and other trades that are affected by AI. It would only cause all the new AI based tools to be behind expensive censored subscription models owned by either Microsoft or Google.

I think forcing all models trained on unlicensed data to be open source is a great idea but actually rooting for civil lawsuits which essentially entail a huge broadening of copyright laws is simply foolhardy imo.

Pretty sure I’m getting a watch from them this Christmas! They put me on the list for one and everything.