You misunderstand, that’s exactly the point. Giving you something to talk about, while rights are eroded elsewhere.
You misunderstand, that’s exactly the point. Giving you something to talk about, while rights are eroded elsewhere.
I get the sentiment, who doesn’t want to dunk on Google?
But the headline is needlessly inflammatory. There is no law yet; and google essentially is saying please please don’t implement it, it totally doesn’t make sense.
Don’t get me wrong, the EU should still implement it. And once it is law; Google will also comply.
From the paper:
The very high concentrations of PFHxA readily extractable from the surfaces of fluoroelastomer watch bands, together with the current limited knowledge on the dermal absorption of PFHxA, demonstrate the need for more comprehensive exposure studies of PFHxA.
So it sounds more like it’s unclear for now. But probably best to about these bands either way.
Have owned one for 2 years. I have made precisely one trip where I was mildly inconvenienced by having to charge one times too many. (That trip was >700km long).
All of the other times it has been amazing. Don’t overthink it too much, really. Just look at all the electric car owners out there - there’s enough of them and as far as I know no one is complaining.
Go for it.
Important update: the right wing / conservative migration plan lost its vote in the parliament.
Gotta admit this is some great popcorn stuff. If it wasn’t so serious.