Every place with free coffee refills knows there’s a reasonable upper limit to what one person can consume.
And if they exceed it, it’s coffee. It’s dirt cheap (just like landline data)
Every place with free coffee refills knows there’s a reasonable upper limit to what one person can consume.
And if they exceed it, it’s coffee. It’s dirt cheap (just like landline data)
Yes I’m sure those aren’t at all made up.
For the good of all of us; except the ones who are dead :(
Yes, it’s also not an emulator.
It’s hard to over-state my satisfaction
Would WP engine not have a case that they failed to enforce their trademark?
They couldn’t even make a circular screen? Or OLED? It looks so ugly.
Yes
And enable a strict firewall
Wine Is Not an Emulator
(Proton is wine)
That’s not autism that’s anxiety.
Actually I read it but I just didn’t understand.
UTSW researchers used a random sample of 8,254 survey participants who answered questions about their drinking habits in 1992 and 2004
They spelled “people with a higher IQ score said they drank more often when asked about it.” wrong.
It was probably written by these fancy autocomplete things.
Nobody is wanting to make a magical algorithm that gets the input to the hash.
I mean, there’s provably at least one person who does, but there are infinite inputs that lead to the same hash.
Breaking a hash is being able to easily create new input data that leads to the same hash (with or without the constraint of needing the original input data)
Oh so both hashes and synmetric cryptography are secure entirely by doubling up the key size. Interesting.
You know way more than I do.
Then why are hashes secure?
If its any consolation every streaming service has this problem.