Bring me the LLM trained my GameCube Animal Crossing residents. I want it to slur me before asking me to drop by and watch the shooting stars on Friday evening.

I actually found it also. I didn’t wanna give traffic to the site, but I just couldn’t see anyone actually showing it.

I can’t find where he’s said this, just reports that he had. Does anyone have a link to it?

Wow, I really loved this analysis. It’s so coherent and clear on reflection, I really have trouble believing any other interpretation is as accurate.

The full idiom of “speak of the devil and he doth appear” seems like it would be chaotic and bizarre.

ADDAB 😔

A lot of parties I went to in Sweden had guests bringing bottles of gas and it seemed to work out for them.

Me, actively giving bonus treats to my cat:

My cat: thank you, anyway she actually starves me, your honor. Can you make the jail cell a cardboard box she cannot move from so I can sleep in her lap?

That you know of!

Wait, why wouldn’t you lock your door?

Jesus, this was both hard to read and hard to stop reading. Really, I was just hard the whole way through. It was. Not I.

No, only eaten copious amounts of ass. 🥰

Jesus Christ, that woman is 40? I have absolutely dropped the ball on my skincare routine. 😭

Comedy is often a banger for depressed people.

I picked up on the reddit reference, but I had no idea how any of the fediverse stuff worked in relation to that. That’s really cool that you can link that way, honestly. So presumably I’m just missing out on exactly what instance and community people are talking about when they say stuff like that?

This is the second /c/ reference I’ve seen tonight. What’s that?

casually searches for the catgirl distro to completely upend my life for a weekend

Doubly true because the children yearn for the mines.

Seems pretty reasonable to use it as a grammar checker. As long as it’s not changing content, just form or readability, that seems like a pretty decent use for it, at least with a purely educational resource like Wikipedia.

I think I’m following what you mean. To me, though, (using your house analogy) it isn’t that your ex has a key, it’s that the government is demanding that your door remain open. Sure, it’s already off the hinges, but it’s a whole lot easier to put a door back on than to fight the government about it. It’s not currently illegal to protect your data through extreme measures, but this is the beginning of laws that make it illegal. That is why this is worth fighting over to me. What’s more, I can hate and fight against more than one thing, so it’s not a huge issue to be against this.

And sure, all this data is out there, but that isn’t true for future generations. Old data becomes stale. It just seems like such a defeatist attitude to me to cede ground on this, especially when the laws you mentioned actually being worried about would use this as precedent. It’s certainly easier to argue for an ID requirement when you have the data on millions of users lying about their age and use it as justification for a more controlled implementation.

But either way, I think I need to step away here. I feel like I understand you, I just disagree and to continue beyond this without doing more reading on the topic, laws, and trends won’t really help, I think (the last I saw for the New York law was that determining what was an adequate attempt to verify age was fell on the AG, who seemed to be leaning towards third party verification. I’m already out of date with developments there).