We’ve completely transitioned from docker to podman where I work. The only pain point was podman compose being immature compared to docker compose, but turns out you can run docker compose with podman using the podman socket easily.
We’ve completely transitioned from docker to podman where I work. The only pain point was podman compose being immature compared to docker compose, but turns out you can run docker compose with podman using the podman socket easily.
Agree. I may be misunderstanding something here, but to view votes one would have to spin up their own instance. This would prevent your average abusive moron from harassing users who down voted their post/comment.
Typically, I can read an “average” open source programmers code. One of the issues I have with C++ is the standard library source seems to be completely incomprehensible.
I recently started learning rust, and the idea of being able to look at the standard library source to understand something without having to travel through 10 layers of abstraction was incredible to me.
Agree with this. I think tactfully pointing out minor issues you see can be helpful because the implementor is closer to the problem and may have just overlooked the issue and can come up with a solution easily. I’ve been on the giving and receiving end of this, and so long as everyone is behaving professionally, it’s always been helpful.
On the “tactful” note, I’ll generally say something like: “I don’t have a solution, but I see problem. I don’t know that this is reason enough to hold up this PR. I’ll leave it up to you.”
I am but I’m very quickly finding out I have nothing to contribute.
Oops. Thanks for the correction.
I hadn’t heard of quadlets. I’ll have to give them a look.