I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.
I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable.
Eugenics is not inherently bad, it’s just frequently used as an excuse to do really evil shit.
A wealthy man from Soth Africa has weird views on eugenics? I’m shocked!
Are you sure that wasn’t just an attempted joke about the phrase asexual reproduction?
Now it’s a Z:\bra
The fuckers already raised the price to “compete with inflation”. I might have been able to accept that by itself, but with this shit added in? It really reveals their intent.
The worst part of it is that those same assholes that insisted on micro transactions will blame every other aspect of the game before admitting that it did poorly on release because of the blatant money grabbing.
If somebody called me a seppo, I wouldn’t be offended, I’d just think they were kind of dumb. It’s just too silly to take seriously as an insult.
Well, no. That’s a kind of coffee.
I don’t get the hype either, but maybe it gets better in the second half? I’ve never managed to sit all the way through it.
a= “birds are dinos”
b= “dinos are reptiles”
c= “birds are reptiles”
Structure: If a then b, therefore c
a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”)
You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles