Though quite interestingly all of Hitler’s policies revolved around massive stimuli by the government -that were funded by debts, property of jews and other unwanted people and plundered territories.
This time around it’s all about cutting government expenses, yet the worse-off buy in.
It only sounds complex and the workings are intricate. But the constitution is relatively straightforward in this regard. Germany uses a codified law system after all and its constitution is relatively new by comparison
We’re almost future weapons designers at this point. So when flying Bradley?
In Germany and I bet in other Europe countries as well, there are official free legal advise dates in courts. You just go there and ask a lawyer for free legal advice. I think that is your best and easiest bet. If they tell you to sue then you might have a shot and can potentially get quite a bit of money back
There’s virtually no crime that can be physically redeemed, except for property crimes. Literally any other criminal offense creates an irredeemable injury. But that is exactly why nearly developed country, except for the USA have a redemption-type penal system. How do you measure redemption? Is r*pe redeemed after 4 or 50 years? It will never be for the victim.
But what you can do is try to help everyone to not become criminal again. Because for one, guess what, they’re human too. They weren’t born criminal and aren’t criminal by nature once they’ve committed a crime. They have the right to live their life as much as the guy they killed. Once you have them forfeit their right to a free life, you commit a similar crime. One that in this case is done by objectifying them as an object rather than a subject.
This thinking is the result of hundreds of years of philosophical thinking and seeing the result of your mindset being used by tyrannys.
If they do not pose a danger to anyone anymore and have reformed then they are to be let go. Also in dubio pro reo.
As for minors, their mind is still developing, they may have cognitively known that killing someone is wrong, but they have not yet accepted it as their own moral. Not knowing even the basics of cognitive development of children, I feel like there’s not even a point to discuss with you
There’s an easy solution for that, you pay only fee of sum x for any surgery, the rest is paid by your insurance. They have the money, power and leverage to actually realise competition in the medical field
That’s a Zëven Provincien Class frigate right? Looks similar to the Sachsen-class with the Smart-L on the aft tower and the bridge design, but has that gap between VLS and bridge (except for that I’d have said Sachsen-class)
Edit: just noticed the radar one the first tower and the funnel being seperated, is this a British destroyer, Type 13 something?
I’m gonna steal this excuse and apply it to German (Doktor/Doktorin)
One time use though - for the vacuum cleaner and the house as well as the user
Actually now that I think about - excellent combo-deal
NonCredibleDefense being way too credible once more. This entire conflict has been way too weird to be non-credible about.
On your back obviously, do you even lift?
It is a crime to cross the Autobahn
Yeah no, they are made from wood because that is cheaper and quicker to build. That is it. Even in the USA, houses were build from stone or cinderblocks until shortly after the 2nd world war.
Sort of in the way that I frequently think I am too lazy to start. When you’re into the action, you don’t really question it anymore - or anything for that matter- but just go with the flow. When it’s done you don’t regret it either.
I know plenty of guys that regularly have Sex, but still own or tried fleshlights or other toys.
I get your argument, but I’d say it’s probably better suited for life-sized realistic Sex dolls
Or maybe, just maybe don’t built your house like you want to rebuild it every 10 years and just use concrete/stone
Harry Potter and the underlying of Pop in the USA
Q.e.d.
Right the resistance forces that generally like to resist more by blowing up civilians than soldiers.
As for the 2nd part, my man this is noncredible defense, it is literally the raison d’être to laugh about weird shit that is happening in armed conflicts. It is partly a coping mechanism and partly ridicule.
As for laughing at civilian casualties, you’ve inferred that into the meme, it was bot even hinted at.
There have always been shows and movies that do it better and less “into-the-face” than others.