But that’s the great thing about Lemmy - you can just go to another instance and continue using Lemmy if you disagree with some admins decisions.

What’s your complaint?

Thanks. China looks like it might have a big problem on its hands with that large volume of young men without partners.

Big yikes on that pyramid. Please could you share where you got it from?

Well the prototype wasn’t even legs, so maybe we should just come up with an entirely new model?

I vote hexapod.

I dunno, it delegitimised the usefulness of Twitter somewhat. Now you can’t be certain that the NASA account that announces an apocalyptic asteroid is real or not.

Bear in mind that graph that I copied overlaps more due to it being relative to high-meat diets (hence no error bars on that group).

The supplementary data shows much less overlap of 95% confidence intervals.

This seems needlessly pedantic, presumably because of a similar argument as the other commenter - that veganism is a philosophy and not just a diet. However, as the other commenter highlighted, veganism begets a vegan diet.

You also don’t have to follow an entirely vegan philosophy to follow a strict vegan diet.

Not to mention “100% plant based” implies you don’t eat fungi!

The study is about diets and their consequent impact on GHG. Why does it matter that it’s not about philosophy?

Eh, cows are the biggest contributor but all ruminants are applicable as another poster highlighted.

Also the study does include fish eaters too, as a separate dietary category.

For anyone interested, high-meat diet was defined as >100g meat per day.

Never mind the fact cows release methane which is 25 times more warming than CO².

I’m not really sure the point your trying to make here.

If they sold them in the supermarket, I would absolutely have cricket-fried rice.

No, the title is correct as far as I can tell from quickly skimming the actual Nature article.

Unrelated rant - I hate the fact independent.co.uk hyperlinks the word ‘study’ which just searches it’s own site for the fucking word ‘study’ rather than linking to the actual source data. Fucking shitstain practices.

I found the original article by plugging the independent article into ground.news. Fucking love that website.

Edit: what’s more is that it’s eating more than 100g of meat per day is 4 times more GHG than eating vegan. Eating <50g per day is about 2 times more than veganism.

Yeah - what I meant by ‘unilateral’ is that beehaw defederating from .world is that .world users can’t interact with beehaw communities, PLUS beehaw.org users can’t interact with .world communities.

Unilateral defederation to me would mean the first case, but not the second.

So you see, Your Honour, we didn’t sell Facebook any data - we just sold Facebook the ability to harvest our users data directly.

I don’t use separate profiles (which I reckon are analogous to accounts) - but Firefox does have a feature called ‘Container tabs’ where you can isolate a sessions cookies into a container (default ones are labelled things like Shopping, Personal, Work, etc).

However, I think these are somewhat moot now as I think Firefox handles cookies differently in some way that went over my head - so I’m doing that thing where I post a semi incorrect answer to ensure someone shows up with the correct one.

Doesn’t Google fund Mozilla so it doesn’t get done for monopolising the market?

Besides Google’s intentions - the funding doesn’t influence how Firefox is developed.

Anecdotal experience is great.

I’ve never once come across a website that doesn’t work in Firefox and find Chrome and Edge significantly slower.

You sure about that? I’m pretty certain that unilateral defederation is not possible yet.

The purpose of the fediverse is to have things that are spread out and can talk to each other, right?

My point was only beehaw trying to cultivate a safe space that is closely policed isn’t easily compatible with that baked-in interaction with other spaces which they can’t police. Unless they play server whack-a-mole.

And then once large instances are cut off because they contain too many users to police when they interact on beehaw.org - what’s the point in being part of the fediverse? Why not just be any other type of link aggregating forum?

It would make a little more sense if you could defederate unilaterally (i.e. non beehaw members cannot post on beehaw, but beehaw members can go interact on other instances). But as far as I understand that’s not how it works.