And in a generally quite good journal…

Well, science hippies and their humour ¯_(ツ)_/¯

I mean, not that worse things haven’t passed the peer review…

Links or it didn’t go through the peer review

Overall. I wonder, if somebody gives me a Lambo, can I sell it, buy a bus, and drive friends in it?

I wonder which one is more expensive, a new Lamborghini or a new bus.

You mean just take the bus?

Yes, but… Let’s say papers A, B, and C are introducing methods. Often, each paper will choose to show the benchmarks in which their tool was the best. In reality, each tool might be better for a different task. If you understand the tools, and have gotten used to this kind of papers, you will probably get what each tool is good for. But the papers themselves are misleading, and people often just blindly use the “cutting edge” for everything.

"I shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt.”

This sounds like basically every description of modern digital/statistical tool

Only recently, I watched The Wind Rises and I loved it. I do not know what it is. It still has the sensitivity and the aesthetics of Ghibli under Miyazaki, which I genuinely love, but at the same time shows a confusing and unobvious real-life story, and very real dilemmas.

I guess it would take a lot of time to accommodate Mars for trees. More than for algae ;)

Let the 5-year-old watch Shrek or sth.

Subversive. By mocking an extreme, you want to avoid the main issue here: Marvel is a toxic shithole normalized by aggressive marketing.

I upvote because the flowers look cool, no idea what Faygo is though