

No, she’s much wittier than I am. Though I did try to write it in her style.
Ask me anything.
I also develop Tesseract UI


No, she’s much wittier than I am. Though I did try to write it in her style.


Probably the easiest is to use a different UI.
Both Photon (https://photon.lemmy.world/) and Tesseract (https://t.lemmy.world/) will let you directly edit the mod team from the community settings pages.


I had a “2-3 weeks” ETA about 2 months ago for the initial beta release. Looks like that ship sailed. In the last few days I’m kind of getting back into the swing of development but I’m still behind and can’t devote as much time to it as I’d like.
I think the last thing that’s preventing a beta release is the settings importer is unfinished (had to be re-written). Once that’s done, I can at least get the beta out for use. There’s a few other cosmetic things I need to fix as well but it’s still usable.


Tesseract (t.lemmy.world) both badges and lets you filter new accounts. You can configure the number of a days an account is considered “new” from 1 to 30 days. Anything that’s filtered will be shown as a stub/collapsed item in the feed.
In the upcoming release (delayed due to personal issues but in progress), you can completely hide content from new accounts (versus just collapsing it) among other filters.
Additionally, (in the upcoming release) it will automatically hide content from users less than a week old who have deleted their accounts. This feature is a direct response to this “hit it and quit it” nonsense from the accounts you’re describing.


Instance blocking is just blocking all communities on that instance, unfortunately.
Like Blaze said, you can try Piefed (LW also operates a Piefed instance) or you can use an alternate UI for Lemmy that does hide users from blocked instances. Not sure which do except Tesseract (https://t.lemmy.world/) since I wanted to be able to do the same thing.
The setting for that is under Settings -> Filtering -> Hide Users From Blocked Instances


Very nice!


Unfortunately, there’s many many reasons that could be the case. I’m just putting this out there since it’s easy to check for and mitigate against.


No, that’s just /api/v3/user which returns both posts and comments.


Good idea with the f2b integration.
I thought about that before just blocking unscoped requests to that endpoint in Nginx.


That was my thought, but also wasn’t sure since there might be a use-case I’m unfamiliar with. I vaguely recall seeing a feature request for Photon a while back to be able to just browse comments, so I assume that would be how it worked.
But yeah as it is now, it can be abused.


That’s my normal go-to, but more than once I’ve accidentally blocked locations that Let’s Encrypt uses for secondary validation, so I’ve had to be more precise with my firewall blocks


Lemmy. I added a comment above since LW wouldn’t let me edit the post.
Mine’s only extended with some WAF rules and I’ve got a massive laundry list of bot user agents that it blocks, but otherwise it’s pretty bog standard.
If instances have Anubis setup correctly (i.e. not in front of /api/...) then that might not help them since this is calling the API endpoint.


Can’t edit the post (Thanks Cloudflare! /s) but additional info:


I shouldn’t say this, but whatever: It’s a “troll” tactic to do that since mods/admins can’t ban with content removal if the account is deleted (unless that’s fixed in .13?) . Admins can remove the deleted flag in the DB for the user and then do so, but mods can only remove items individually. Not that any of these necessarily warrant removal on their own, but not doing so in this case encourages this kind of “hit it and quit it” behavior, and this user is clearly ban evading.
I’m not saying this as an instruction manual but merely as a statement of fact about how stupid Lemmy’s behavior is with regard to deleted accounts.


They’ve had many, many alts over the last 6+ months with the same posting pattern. Not one has been marked as a bot.


Ok, I just gotta ask: what is your motive here?
You get banned every other day for spamming out a massive number of posts. And you just make a new account the next day, start the exact same thing again like…you’ve learned nothing?
I’m tired of my feed being an entire page of just you, and I’m tired of blocking you. Can you not just post things at a normal rate?


but I send you a PM
Oh, sorry. One of the new features in this dev branch is the ability to disable PMs and mentions. I’ve been running with those turned off. Seems like that feature is working lol.
I turned DMs back on and found the message - will try to join here when I’m back on desktop. Dunno how active I can be right now, but I am eventually going to start on Piefed so would be nice to have a sounding board.
Some of the devs are already working on shared logic/libraries between apps.
Nice!


Oh, I meant just if the instance isn’t know, I thought resolving would make it “aware” of that instance. I could be wrong. But yeah, the instance would have to federate with the other one for it to be able to resolve, though. e.g. it won’t resolve an object from an instance that is on the current instance’s “block” list.


I believe you can, yeah, and I also think that “bootstraps” that instance to yours if it doesn’t already know about it. But in that case, the way I have the search written, it’ll “fall back” to regular search which also does resolveObject. That just takes longer.
The ap_id check is just to short-circuit that behavior to avoid the lengthy, often unnecessary, search and quickly redirect you to your instance’s local copy.
Have had that working for about a week now, and it’s pretty nice. Please do steal this feature lol.
To be, like, super and needlessly pedantic, lol, Linus looks like her since she’s older.