thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
thanks for the explanation. i guess it really doesn’t work as a meme if I’ve doesn’t happen to know this particular image.
yeah this is what i used for some projects, i.e. rmarkdown which also integrates the statistics part
and then there are fucking PIs insisting on word files who never heard of tracked charges let alone of file naming conventions.
where are the flood tunnels installed to guard the treasure?
I’m having the same problem. this kind of nested argument is quite annoying to program in e.g. argp. i am even thinking of using a minimal forth like parser to do this.
if it remember it correctly it was said in relation to algorithm optimization > code optimization
die hard.
love a hot fuzz reference https://youtu.be/mcFN-I7_IjA?t=168&feature=shared
a regular on retraction watch (highly recommended): https://retractionwatch.com/?s=gueguen
my 1WO stares at me in utter disbelief how his supposedly ace of a Kaleun could fuck up this badly. again. (Silent Hunter 3. snuck into a convoy at night and bad weather. convoy zigs towards me, no time for final speed estimation, i go with last estimate, 4 eels in the water, all pass ahead. possibility: convoy slowed one knot due sea state. decide to surface to reposition. have a brainfart, my artillery starts shooting. hell breaks loose, star shells and searchlights everywhere. both engines AK, course 90. destroyer follows shooting star shells. half an hour zigzagging until he loses me.
thanks! but i can’t access the site (certificate expired some certificate related error, then, page not found). I’ll try again later
i feel like half the article is missing
does anyone know whether these results were obtained while taking the size of the dictionary into account?
no it’s not. but you should know what you’re getting into.
in the beginning of my PhD i really loved what i was doing. from an intellectually point of view i still do. but later, i.e. after 3 years doing a shitty postdoc, i realized that I was not cut out for academia but nevertheless loved doing science.
however, i was lucky to find a place in industry doing what i like.
so i guess my 2c is: think about what comes after the PhD and work towards that goal. a PhD is usually not a goal in itself. hth