Ngl its kinda goofy but actually an interesting study
Ngl its kinda goofy but actually an interesting study
At least you get the sense of superiority!
…wait…
brb applying for med school
Was going to become a doctor then I realized that literally over 60% of doctors have burnout, yeah that really seems worth the paycheck that I won’t have time to spend
It misses what details are important most of the time or just does a very inelegant job. Even when using gpt4 I still don’t really use it for direct rewrites when it’s something important
I mean to be honest I wouldn’t say that we “die” at all when you sleep… your mind is extremely active while sleeping, it’s just disconnected from motor control.
Classic floating point blunder
I have no idea how to react to this lmao
Love this style of graphic design. Does anyone know what it’s called?
I agree. The way I worded my comment was very intentional to not bash conservatism. I don’t consider myself one but I thought OP’s question was pretty respectful and I do find it unfortunate that he doesn’t have a community on here that isn’t extremely radicalized.
Unfortunately most of the more “conservative” instances became highly toxic and so most other instances have defederated with them.
What paper is this from? I actually want to read this
PUT EMOJIS ON MY GRAVE
It had taken me so many years to break my reddit addiction, then my friend introduced me to lemmy, and it’s been downhill ever since 🥲
because of duckington city? shall we? cheers my friends
I kjnda ljke the way replacjng all i’s wjth j’s looks
Have you ever seen the movie Sorry to Bother You? I feel like you would enjoy it
I mean, LibreOffice is usable, but if I could pay for a linux license of Word or Excel, I would pay for it. The UX is just so much better with feature search/animations/plugin support/etc.
Which, fair enough. It definitely was sarcastic, low-effort, and unlikely to generate conversation. But just say that instead of lecturing me about fallacies, you know? Lol
Holy god my bad
Edit: You know initially I agreed with you, then I realized that your suggested comment accomplishes essentially the same thing.
Anyone would be able to infer from my comment that I don’t support the way that billion dollar companies are allowed to abuse their workers. It implicitly supports the idea that they should not be allowed to. Your suggestion contributes about as much to the discussion as my comment does, and to say that they are meaningfully different implies that people can’t interpret sarcasm.
Both my comment and your suggestion are saying something obvious, but so is the article. That’s the joke.
You can feel superior in the way that twin brothers feel superior to each other