There’s always assholes and they are always making it do bad things, so the distinction isn’t even there. If you don’t plan for assholes using the tool to try and do bad things, you’re making bad technology
- 1 Post
- 10 Comments
eluvinar@szmer.infoto Lord of the memes@midwest.social•Maybe they've always been MordorEnglish6·4 months ago
eluvinar@szmer.infoto Lord of the memes@midwest.social•Maybe they've always been MordorEnglish10·4 months agooh yes, the small policing action known as The Cold War that almost ended the human civilization
collaborative and free to access and use
Except GPL which is literally “either join our socialist software revolution or fuck off and make your own software”.
eluvinar@szmer.infotoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•And where did you get that info?English6·7 months agoand a lot of questionable consent sex situations if I remember correctly
eluvinar@szmer.infoto memes@lemmy.world•Can we just move on from the US 2024 election?51·8 months agojudging by project 2025 they can stop their own agenda by not being able to agree what it is.
But it has been changed a lot?
The most basic immediate execution four operation calculator might still look the same, but that’s because it’s a very simple thing and you can’t really get much wrong. For scientific calculators the UI has changed lots. As have the requirements. It used to be a specialist tool used to do thousands of calculations daily. An expensive thing that had to earn its keep. RPN and stuff like that made sense for people who could easily get back weeks of training in just a few years of being slightly more efficient while working. Now we have the natural order delayed execution thing, because the calculators are mostly for students. Who need the UI to be as easy to grasp as possible, because they won’t ever have to do enough calculations to benefit from a faster but harder UI. That doesn’t mean any of those approaches to UI is better or worse. Some things require instructions and making everything idiot-proof shouldn’t ever be the ultimate goal (check out modern computing for why!).
eluvinar@szmer.infoto Technology@lemmy.world•YouTube’s ad blocker crackdown now includes third-party appsEnglish4·1 year agoexactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.
It’s not trivial to make sure over the network on a device you don’t control that you’re talking with an app you think you are talking with. Just look how multiplayer games fail to combat cheaters and resort to kernel anticheats, and then still fail to assure the players are actually using the legit application. It’s actually pretty much impossible in any open ecosystem, maybe possible on something like chromecast where you get to control almost anything (as long as someone doesn’t hack it to run custom firmware, like they do with every console ever).
Not only is this impossible, it always makes the experience for your legit users worse (but hey, if they are fine with the level of ads on yt today they probably don’t care if google were to mine bitcoins on their phones).
eluvinar@szmer.infoto Technology@lemmy.world•YouTube’s ad blocker crackdown now includes third-party appsEnglish1·1 year agoYouTube’s Youtube crackdown now includes third-party apps
There’s a chance, but I don’t think you argued why would it be a good chance.
Changing lanes and overtaking are always some of the most risky moments. It’s always going to be much much safer if everybody drives the same speed vs. if you have to dodge because people are going 250 km/h for lulz. If you have the stricter training and policing, you still can improve safety by introducing speed limits.