That’s not how brackets work?

In this case it’s … Really not worth explaining anything? And it’s not like it’s an unusual tool. It’s just a pry bar.

Agree in general though

There’s a difference between emulation and what Analogue does. Analogue’s products actually implement the hardware of their respective consoles in FPGAs. (Also, what Kecessa said)

That’s a narrow genre

Is “gorror” a term? It should be

I don’t think that’s as Indian-specific as you think

You can, pretty easily. Enable developer mode and use adb. Doesn’t need root. (At least I didn’t for YouTube; not sure about the rest)

Ironically one of the games without Ganon. Although iirc the nightmare does take the form of Ganon at one point? So maybe

The fediverse is basically anything that uses some means of connecting to other sites. A lot of them now use ActivityPub, a standard for this kind of thing.

Mastodon isn’t “on” Lemmy, but they can communicate with each other

This happens all the time. I feel like a big reason people don’t like meetings is that they tend to involve a lot of bikeshedding.

That concern is feigned, for PR.

Chinese chess is round chess. Shogi is pointy chess. Chess is icon chess.

The non-pointy sides are also sloped. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi#/media/File%3AShogi_Koma_Ryoko.jpg

Square baduk

Computers are binary, yeah? So we have to represent fractional numbers with binary, too.

In decimal, numbers past the decimal point are 10^-1, 10^-2, … etc. In binary, they’re 2^-1, 2^-2, …

2^-1 is one half, so 0.1 in binary is 0.5 in decimal. 2^-2 is one quarter. 0.11 in binary is 0.75 in decimal. And of course you’ve got 0.01 = 0.25

The problem comes when representing decimal numbers that don’t have neat binary representations. For instance, 0.1 in decimal is actually a repeating binary number: 0.0001100110011…

Fun fact: NaN is of type number

You’re adding a bunch of zeroes. Zero is the additive identity. It doesn’t change the value.

Why not? How does that change the value?

Infinities do have different sizes, yes. But not on that scale. Both of these are countably infinite sets.

Think about this: there are infinitely many primes. Obviously, not every number is prime. But you can still map primes 1:1 with the natural numbers. They’re both the same size of infinity.

That’s not how infinity works