* Millions of people who wouldn’t or couldn’t have bought Photoshop still edited photos. Adobe lost nothing.

I’m sure he thinks our reaction to his friendship with Epstein is histrionic as well.

Looking forward to hearing how the flag-botherers all turned out to march in protest at this.

Except love their daughter unconditionally.

If a human copies someone else’s art, that is copyright infringement. You say that AI works exactly the same way. Somehow you think that people should not be angry when AI is used to copy their work. If I ask you what is 2+2, will you tell me 5?

This is the man we just gave all the NHS data to.

I didn’t realize that lifejackets were prone to spontaneous combustion.

Why even discuss it? Putin broke the 1994 agreement and he declared that the Minsk agreements no longer existed in 2022, just prior to invading again.

But if the UK can’t read everyone’s communications, how will they stop 80-year-olds from sitting down in public places holding cardboard signs?

They also said that they were cancelling lifetime contracts that hadn’t been used in 6 months. Hard to see how those could be sinking the company.

The bicycles are another thing they’re ignoring. If someone wanted to leave the area, why wouldn’t they go on their bicycle? It would be faster. Those people didn’t want to be in the road, and they wanted to get out of the road in enough of a hurry that they didn’t wheel their bicycles to the side.

They spend loads of time labelling people with “taking cover” without ever considering that people take cover when they are being fired on.

I think we have to thank people like this for demonstrating that losing your collection isn’t just a theoretical risk.

Well thank goodness that Microsoft isn’t pushing AI on us as hard as it can, via every channel that it can.

I don’t think that the safe harbour provision should apply when the person posting is the owner of the company.

Is one of those things giving attribution? If I ask for a picture of Mount Fuji in the style of a woodblock print, can the AI tell me what its inspirations were?

AIs take away attribution as well as copyright. The original authors don’t get any credit for their creativity and hard work. That is an entirely separate thing from ownership and property.

It is not at all OK for an AI to take a work that is in the public domain, erase the author’s identity, and then reproduce it for people, claiming it as its own.

A reply to the original post, from a lemmy.ml account. I blocked them, so I can’t link you to it.

How about the comment further up - “daily dot world self-soothing thread” ?

On .ml, communists get called lib. Ask me how I know.