every time someone tried to call me in i would say i’ve had alcoholic drinks; they shut up pretty quick after that.

dunno, if it does, then yay?

popOS just because they have an installer that includes nvidia drivers out of the box.

i agree with the first part

i don’t know, i just got here

the ewoks seemed pretty civil to me tbh

i am sure it will be “too expensive” for the next 30 to 40 years.

same, i also abuse free trials pretty hard.

(virtual credit cards and visa gift cards with little to no money on them work great)

oh hell yea new tech connections video

they aren’t.

glug glug

you can keep self sucking all you want; it’s a genocide. eat me.

cool, i’m going to go to your house and squat in your backyard with a questionable document that says i have the right to be there. then, i’ll start expanding into the structure of your home by destroying key areas. then, i’ll start taping out walkways through your home you will not be allowed to use. if any member of your family attempts to stop this i will use my extensive military might to kill them.

this process will continue many decades. feel free to go with the flow.

what’s the logical conclusion of your point here?

but when the IDF does it it’s a feature?

it’s a genocide; that’s the point.

Nobody comes out of this clean.

it’s a genocide; it’s not rational.

jesus christ you should be shoved into a locker

hmm, this is sort of helpful.

this is pretty much what i think, yeah.

a lot of programming/software design is already kinda that anyway. it’s a bunch of people who were educated on computer science principles, data structures, mathematicians, and data analytics/stats who write code to specs to solve very specific tool problems for very specific subsets of workers, and who maintain/update legacy code written decades ago.

now, yeah, a lot things are coded from scratch, but even then, you’re referencing libraries of code written by someone awhile ago to solve this problem or serve this purpose or do thing, output thing. that’s where LLMs shine, imo.

i didn’t downvote you, regardless internet points don’t matter.

you’re not wrong, and i largely agree with what you’ve said, because i didn’t actually say a lot of the things your comment assumes.

the most efficient way i can describe what i mean is this:

LLMs (this is NOT AI) can, and will, replace more and more of us. however, there will never, ever be a time where there will be no human overseeing it because we design software for humans (generally), not for machines. this requires integral human knowledge, assumptions, intuition, etc.

exactly, this will eliminate some jobs, but anyone who’s asked an LLM to fix code longer than 400 lines knows it often hurts more than it helps.

which is why it is best used as a tool to debug code, or write boilerplate functions.