Because they don’t care about quality in depth content. They’re just in it for the clicks. Probably had an algorithm fill in the remaining paragraphs

Here’s todays winner for most unintelligible title

It’s over man. Live in the now!

It really should be proper fedi-etiquette for a community owner to seek out and link to similar communities in the side bar. Not sure why they don’t do that either.

Environmental damage is reversible

Oh good point, it’s not like some gigantic bathtub

I don’t know much about how the canal works… why does it need rain water? Isn’t it connected to the ocean on both ends?

I get that there’s a system of locks to raise/lower ships, but dont those just pump salt water in/out?

Substantial confounding in studies like this though. I haven’t read the paper but they usually can only control for basic demographics, not the nuances of parenting style and engagement, which could certainly be correlated with both screen time and development.

That ship has got to be quite a bit heavier than pre-industrial sail ships though right?

Motive, not means

You gotta love a headline that presumes to know the motive for a murder

I really want to know the title of this book

Your suspicions are confirmed. I have indeed worn wool socks and touched a metal item.

Oh god. When one of the most unstable, poverty-stricken counties in the world is at risk of “spiraling out of control”, it’s really bad. Today it’s a refugee crisis and genocide, next year it’ll be mass food insecurity :(

Especially disheartening because there was genuine optimism in 2019.

I too amphoret

Titlegore

Very naive question - why is it so hard to find landmines?

Why can’t you see the holes where they placed the mines from a helicopter?

Is there no machine that can “see” underground and help locate them?

Is there no way to just spray a bunch of objects in the field and detonate them?

…since 1979

Edit: not saying there’s not a climate change disaster happening, but some of these analyses are a little misleading.