did you actually look? or are you just assuming? because they both have an India branch

well damn, if you really can’t find a difference between the 2–3 parties, that generally means you don’t actually care much about what they do.

As for being a fascist, if you help fascists, I think you’re a fascist, and the anti voting BS does in fact help the fascist. the oligarchs control politics in large part because of the same voter apathy you are spreading right now, we had governments, be it in Europe, America, Asia, or Africa that worked against corporate interests, until people became apathetic about it.

but you claim to critique the status quo, when you don’t even understand the status quo and how we got here.

That is a lot of wish thinking there my friend. do you know why sensationalism works with the Google feed? because it works at getting people to consume your media. any business that relies on people consuming media wants as many people consuming said media as possible, incentivizing them to sensationalize.

You on the other hand made the moral argument in capitalism, something that should be so obviously wrong that unrealistic is an understatement. And look at you, it worked, by sensationalizing the issue of news, you now mainly consume their media.

they both have reporters around the world in unlikely places, go check them out yourself

your experience is good and all, but the president exists, they very much can be everything for everyone, just look at the power companies used to have locally

you do realize that there are other news sources like DW or AZ who do publish counter to the big cooperate news outlets as well?

true, 4-Chan!

much better news source!

Oh, the “no party tailor made to do exactly what I want” argument.

see, that’s still 2-3 more realistic choices than the literal corpo-fascism that forms around monopolies, but please, keep repeating the BS line literally made by anti-democratic institutions whose entire purpose is to make you a lethargic apathetic voter

you think you would get anything else if you do pay? honest question. what incentive is there for “individually funded media” to report anything better? In fact, why would they NOT sensationalize stuff? it leads to better sales and a stronger reader retention.

it’s not the solution you think it is, your best bet is to go to news aggregators like ground news and even that isn’t a 100% solution.

fuck Russia? that’s western propaganda already! Russia is an innocent nation being forced to invade its surroundings because NATO exists, it all makes complete sense as long as you ascribe to the literal geopolitical framework of the Nazis (geo-political realpolitik, yes a large part of said ideology was literally authored by a few prominent Nazis, no wonder everyone who uses it just ends up doing evil shit)

a lot of that profit is derived from a set of rug pulls that only work because he had the money of the victims to keep pushing his image in the media

they have some perks, privileges and exceptional powers no democratic country would give to them

wait until you learn about the supreme court in the USA

ya, the US is the only nation that will tax any money you make even if you don’t live in the US or work in the US

This just in, child online upset that people recommend the open source solution to an issue caused by proprietary crap.

In other news, OP who had said question responds to helpful suggestion with “Cool!!!”

We at OPBR (Orrk Public Broadcast Radio, your favorite pirate news satire group) think that someone needs to cool their beans

ok, I’m sorry that you are upset that in a closed system like Microsoft you often don’t have a choice with organizations ramming their enshitification into your user experience. but some stupid hate against people who have been working to give you an alternative is just not ok.

There’s a bit of a difference between doing some unethical stuff, and orchestrating multiple coup of democratic governments to be replaced with authoritarian dictatorships, or hiring an international death squad to assassinate troublesome workers who want to get paid, and of course let us not forget undermining our own democracy!

you’re lacking English or economic comprehension skills are no reason to start creating straw men, you’re wasting all that bedding for the rest of your fellow sheep

I’m not insulting anyone, if you feel slighted about the fact that you didn’t understand OP, nor do you understand how taxes work, then I invite you to do some basic research about tax law in the US, because you don’t seem to know how taxes work

that’s like the point of the entire system? I mean, I don’t want to go back to the 1800s corporate baronies that defined most industry at that point in time

ok, so I understand that you don’t quite get the issue, also your bad at taxes.

if I invest $50000 and make $100000 I don’t want to pay taxes on the $50000 I “made” (this normally would lead to the crime of not paying taxes) but if I use those $50000 as leverage on an extremely low interest loan for $50000 then I dodge having to pay anything in taxes while also, defacto, realizing my gains.

what OP is advocating for is taxing those $50000 you put up as collateral, making these $50000 similar to the original $50000 you invested, now should you again make another $20000 from said capital, and pull out, you would still have to pay capital gains on those $20000, or do you think you have to pay capital gains on money you put in? (hence why you’re bad at taxes) because tax is only levied on the positive difference