It’s fine, provided it’s not a plot hole - i.e. your fantasy setting needs to not have abolished blindness as a realistic malady, which some settings do. E.g. LOTR 100% has blind people, while the Harry Potter universe only has very poor blind people, since solving blindness is as trivial as a polyjuice potion, even if nothing else works (and something more effective is bound to work).
He couldn’t remember if he did or not, is the joke.
It is making mistakes, not lying. To lie it must believe it is telling falsehoods, and it is not capable of belief.
The Netherlands don’t have freedom of speech, though, so that’s immaterial. The closest thing they have is Article 7, Subarticle 3 in general, which only means they can’t legally be compelled to seek prior approval for speech.
No, they said what they were referring to: AFP saying things without confirmation.
I don’t think you’re gonna have an easy time finding people on Lemmy to defend Russia’s actions in this war.
I think you mean do know nothing.
Or… well, on the ship itself it’s spelled New New, which is a lot saner and funnier than Newnew.
What, even the ones predating locomotives?
Equating Israelis with Jews is, itself, anti-Semitic.
Communism is a hell of a drug.
No. The Libertarian party is the least coherent of the four, and you can’t count on any consistency in their platform. They seem to do zero policing of their candidates’ attitudes.
I think you mean false premise or argument from false premises. “A, therefore B”, even though A is false.
Well, the poster is mostly linguistic prescriptivism (defining what words mean). That small caveat at the bottom that words can mean whatever you want them to can’t really defeat the entire rest of the poster.
Who pronounces it m’kay instead of 'mkay?
Doing that doesn’t teach children to share - it teaches them to avoid getting caught because both the abuser and the victim will be punished, so even as the victim it’s best to keep your abuse private.
You’re describing criminal cases, OP asked about civil. A civil case has no prosecution, no “charges” per se, and no “sentence” per se (in a civil case you have awarded damages instead).
Chiropracty isn’t “scientific”.