It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.
But they’re biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They’re never neutral arbiters of justice.
It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.
But they’re biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They’re never neutral arbiters of justice.
X Window
Begrudging respect for correct name
LOL I disagree.
LOL I’m not asking because I don’t understand and I want you to explain it to me, I’m trying to get you to see the error in your thinking.
No. Heat affects everyone. Regarding Debian, what exactly do you think has affected everyone?
So then your original question isn’t ‘How “out of date” is Debian really?’ but ‘If you complain that Debian is “out of date”, what do you mean?’
Not new
And what do you mean by “new” exactly?
What do you mean by “out of date” exactly?
a pleasant discussion
About what?
I thought you were legitimately confused
I’m just curious: if I had been confused, what were you expecting would have happen if you simply repeated what the article had already stated without adding anything?
in their own field there’s a good chance they have something useful to say
Pity this press release wasn’t one of them.
You’re just repeating the article. Nothing you said contradicts what I said.
It’s a HINT
What is?
“One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.” ― James D. Watson, The Double Helix
LOL yes I know thanks.
The number of kaon to pion and neutrino/antineutrino decays the team observed is higher than the 8.4 per 100 billion predicted by the Standard Model, but it’s still within the uncertainty parameters.
So then how the fuck does that hint at new physics? Idiots.
Terrible report, doesn’t even say the cause of death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test
You doing OK?
you’re attributing those views to “the citizenry”
I haven’t attributed anything to the citizenry. I wrote two distinct paragraphs, only one of which contained the word “citizenry”.
Who decides who is a “party”?