• 0 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle

  • Yep, you can. Came as a surprise to me as well at the time but you definitely can.

    You probably got this already if you look ta the Tesseract page and how this all works but I wanted to share with you my docker-compose file to give you an idea how I did it. I find it helpful to look at examples of others sometimes.

    Good luck!

    # Docker Compose for : Tesseract
    # This is a GUI frontend local hosted for Lemmy
    
    services:
      tesseract:
        image: ghcr.io/asimons04/tesseract:latest
        container_name: tesseract
        restart: always
        environment:
          # The domain of Tesseract's 'default' instance. 
          # This is the only required config variable
          - PUBLIC_INSTANCE_URL=feddit.nl
          
          # By default, Tesseract locks itself to the configured instance. 
          # To allow users to add accounts from other instances, set this to false.
          - PUBLIC_LOCK_TO_INSTANCE=false
          
          # Feed, feed sort, and comment sort settings
          - PUBLIC_DEFAULT_FEED=Subscribed
          - PUBLIC_DEFAULT_FEED_SORT=Hot
          - PUBLIC_DEFAULT_COMMENT_SORT=Hot
    
          # Default to Dark Theme instead of "System"
          - PUBLIC_THEME=System
    
          # Media Proxying
          # Enable the media proxying module and make it available for use.  
          # It is disabled by default.
          - PUBLIC_ENABLE_MEDIA_PROXY=true
          
          # List of domains that should not be proxied (content reasons, because they won't 
          # work with the proxy, etc)
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_PROXY_BLACKLIST=mintboard.org,iili.io,img.shields.io
          - PUBLIC_ENABLE_MEDIA_PROXY_LOCAL=true
          
          # Pre-set the "Use media proxy" setting for all users.  
          # If set to false (default), users will need to go into Settings->Media 
          # to enable image proxying.
          - PUBLIC_ENABLE_USER_MEDIA_PROXY=true
    
          # Media Caching; disabled by default. Enabled and configured here.
          - PUBLIC_ENABLE_MEDIA_CACHE=true
          - PUBLIC_ENABLE_MEDIA_CACHE_LOCAL=true
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_CACHE_DURATION=4320
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_CACHE_KEEP_HOT_ITEMS=true
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_CACHE_MAX_SIZE=500
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_CACHE_HOUSEKEEP_INTERVAL=5
          - PUBLIC_MEDIA_CACHE_HOUSEKEEP_STARTUP=true
          
          # List of Invidious/Piped domains which should be used for detection. 
          # See docs/CustomYoutubeFrontends.md for more in fo.
          - |-
            PUBLIC_CUSTOM_INVIDIOUS=
              i.devol.it,
              piped.adminforge.de
          
          # List of instances that will be pre-populated into the instance selector on the 
          # community explorer page. 
          # The default instance is included by default and does not need to be listed here.
          - |-
            PUBLIC_FEATURED_INSTANCES=
              lemmy.world,
              mander.xyz,
              programming.dev,
              lemm.ee,
              lemmy.ca,
              lemmy.cafe,
              literature.cafe,
              sh.itjust.works,
              lemmy.blahaj.zone,
              slrpnk.net,
              startrek.website,
              beehaw.org,
              sopuli.xyz,
              lemmy.zip
        
        # Tesseract uses /app/cache inside the container to persist lookups and for the media cache. 
        # This will work without a volume, but anything cached will not persist after the container is restarted.
        
        # Note:  The host directory must be owned by UID/GID 1000.
        volumes:
          - ./cache:/app/cache
        
        # Bind to port 8081 instead of the container's default port of 3000
        ports:
          - 8081:3000
    






  • Never seen a more useless group of people in a room. This means nothing. It is like children pretending to be shop owners and playing business.

    Just ignore this as it is meant to rile up people, just ignore them. Ukraine and Europe should send a message to russia that they are ready for a surrender and prepared to start talking about reparations from russia. If they do not respond continue bombing them. In fact, with the support of Europe Ukraine should expand the war into russia (beyond what they already have).

    Main thing to take away from this is: ignore the children on a BS mission and setup a fact and reality based alternative where adults can join and discuss what to do with this war from russia and how to handle and close it.
    If you respond to this nonsense meeting and get annoyed or whatever, you just legitimized that group of clowns.



  • reddwarf@feddit.nltoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhat happened in 1971?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just don’t think this is all due to hippies in the 60s. 🤷‍♂️

    I am sad and disappointed you failed to grasp what I meant in my diatribe of a post and keep pointing to hippies. I knew the moment I typed that word, bam, it would be someones focal point. So this one is on me, mea culpa. Now please, pretty please with cherries on top, stop referring to hippies as being the center point of my argument. You could not distill this from my post, again my mistake, but if you continue referring to hippies as my argument then that is from now on on you.

    Have a good one.


  • reddwarf@feddit.nltoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhat happened in 1971?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A war is never won without losing battles. I agree a lot has been achieved, this is true.

    Remind me though, what is going on right now on the items you mentioned? And what about that liberal icon called Roe v Wade? Or what about hose rascals at the supreme court? Or what about the older SC justices that will be replaced with better indoctrinated and younger justices? Sure, they take losses but those are short term to them. To them this was to be expected and took the long term vision. Losses are to be expected, like I said wars are not won cleanly, you lose some battles once in a while. I’m not saying they won the war but I am saying that the left is hopelessly incapable of thinking long term. For example, what are the plans on getting liberal justices in the SC? Do you have any idea? I don’t, perhaps they have some super duper secret genius plan to correct the imbalance? Or could they be so utterly incompetent that they are left standing clutching their precious minor participation trophies while the bigger ones somehow all end up with the right? And yes, if I make it sound like a ‘game’ or ‘match’ then you better believe I am. Not because I want to but I do recognize the nonsense coming our way is treated as such and it is successful. So better buckle up and start playing the game or…stand against the wall and pouting.

    I know what you mean and you are not wrong, of course some liberal items got through in society. However, long term planning by conservatives has chipped away at those as you must be aware. And you cannot have missed the massive support for the right at the moment, in the US but also globally. This is not only a US problem, this is a global one.

    Anyway, I feel like I am on a rant and the question was: what is your insight or explanation for that split in the graphic and well, this is mine. So for the sake of my sanity and peace of mind I will now stop explaining or getting into detail, it will change absolutely nothing but has all the markings of getting me down and sad. F that shit.


  • reddwarf@feddit.nltoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhat happened in 1971?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, you misunderstood. The 60’s was a social shock to the conservative system. They responded. And you can complain about conservatives (I know I do) but you have to give it to them on the long term planning bit, they got that on lock.

    The inability to plan, push, execute and claim to keep society ‘left’ was a serious flaw. Conservatives had no such problems, they created systems to alter the course of society. The rise of the religious right in the late 60’s and 70’s influenced the creation of conservative think tanks, for example.

    We are seeing the effects of this conservative push-back till this very day.

    PS: the generation coming out of the 60’ is my parents generation. I find it ironic that a large part of that generation became conservative monsters. They are the very definition of ‘pulling up the ladder’. I have seen it up and close this change and I despise that generation of weaklings.


  • reddwarf@feddit.nltoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhat happened in 1971?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    No sources from me but speculation. It’s the decade before, the 60’s where focus was on people, freedom, honest compensation for labor and social equality.

    I know I will get push-back on this, it being perhaps to simple of a theory or me missing key elements. I will die on this hill though, it was the hippies.
    The conservatives around the world got a collective heart attack from the 60’s and what transpired therein and this is when conservatism started to plan on breaking those wild communist activist freeloaders. We can see the effects today still. Mismanagement from the ‘left’ (or better yet, the world at large tbh) to capitalize on the spirit of the 60’ and truly change society. The focus on business and the suppression of those pesky ‘hippies’ and/or ‘communists’ started to gain traction and voila, there is the divide of the two lines somewhere in the 70’s.

    For good measure, I have nothing against the 60’ and hippies, just pointing to these as a ‘shock to the system’ as an explanation for what happened in the 70’s and what we see today.





  • and it is a Labour government bought and paid for by business that is trying to avoid re-nationalisation and that allows the water regulation body to be comprised of ex-water executives

    This statement makes it about Labour and how they are bought and staff the board to game the whole show.
    Sure, Labour has it’s issues but how and why on earth did you mention Labour in your post and yet fail to mention the true villains of this story, the Tories?

    This reeks of modern political discourse; blame left/labour/liberal/woke but conveniently forget to mention it is actually the mostly the right who keeps introducing legislation and laws to undermine the average citizen.

    This is an issue created and matured under the rule of conservatives/Tories. Asking if the other side, i.e. Labour, will ‘fix’ the crap created by Tories is difficult to answer, who knows what the conservatives did at the time? They might have had provisions in the deal that make it much harder to re-nationalize then you or I think. My point is, you are asking the builders if they can re-build the house which was demolished, burned to a cinder and then salted the earth by the previous builders. Yeah, there’s always a possibility to fix things but you best believe the mess created is much, much bigger and problematic than you initially think. And while asking you insinuate the current builder is actually (partially) to blame. My guess is that it will take no effort or time for people to actually believe this crap and fully blame Labour for this fiasco.

    And if you doubt me or find my statements a bit ‘over the rop’, remember there are millions of people who believe Obama should have stopped 911 and Katrina. Yep, that is the US but the principle stands: people are morons.




  • Chances of me encountering a Polar bear are practically non-existing, as would encountering a Mountain lion for that matter, but I know I would be infinitely more scared for a Polar bear.

    The cat might be hungry, might be just curious but will probably leave you alone.

    A Polar bear though? If you see it, it already knows about you (heard, smelt or seen you) and you can count on 1 of 2 things happening from that moment on. 1) it is contemplating how to hunt you or 2) it is already actively hunting you.

    The thing is, for a Mountain lion there are possibilities of food besides you. You are a big risk for that lion and it will most probably go for easier options. For a Polar bear it is a must to hunt you as the opportunities to get food on polar regions is infinitesimally smaller than on other hunting grounds where Mountain lions would hunt.

    Mountain lions would get my hair to stand on end and make me alert but I walk on nonetheless.
    Polar bears would send me running for the nearest concrete hut and hope the door will hold.