Simple, honest, fair reporting.

We aren’t the baddies we are just so concerned with criticism that we are happy to look the other way.

Or how Google decided to choke on its own greed.

Life in the sea is not dying because we catalogued it, it is dying because we are polluting its environment.

One thing I meant to add but forgot is the best way I can think to explain the effects of music in our minds and our ability to recall long sequences of notes is that human composed music is telling us a story that our brains already know.

Four four common time replicates the heartbeat and natural bodily rhythms but that does not really explain why music can so successfully alter emotional state in the listener. I think it is not really known why other than music connects with and is readily understood by organic brains, not just human in a very intimate way. For example a five minute piece of classical music is informationally very complex but a person is often able to hum it back after a single hearing and do so again years later. Repeating verbatim a five minute speech listened to is beyond most people and so it might be suspected that music is more native to the brain than is language.

Spineless ICE hiding behind their masks and just following orders would be the ideal force to arrest him.

Well every other person that ever existed was raised without ChatGPT being necessary so just ask anyone.

It’s now a lazarusline.

Can you smell burning Spock.

Everyone has sippy bottles now but when I was young in the late 70s we played out all day and did not drink for 7 hours at a time and no one died. Alright one person died but mainly not.

It alludes to the staggering number in the title and in the abstract but does not give the number which means it’s clickbait.

It’s not a starship, at best it’s a low Earth orbit ship.

Whenever I read any sort of AI response all I can hear is ‘All your bases are belong to me’.

I don’t understand the emphasis on biology, it is a potential area of concern admittedly but only one of a great many. It sounds like someone’s personal idiosyncratic fear of disease.

I think he might have been snatched mid-se

The research subject as quoted is a tautology, people separate because they have irreconcilable differences, opposing political views is an irreconcilable difference so the conclusion of the research is that couples with irreconcilable differences are more likely to suffer from the problems associated with irreconcilable differences.

You use taxonomy to remind you to ask Kevin over?

If masked government officers are snatching people from the street without any right to a hearing it is late stage totalitarianism and it is just a matter of time before they come for you whoever you are.

No one is casting aspersions on the scientific method or the value of research, what is questionable in this case is that the conclusion simply follows naturally from the hypothesis. The proposition here is that people who have opposing political views are more likely to be antagonistic to each other, that is a tautology.