Because individuals who believed “don’t take advantage of others” were at evolutional disadvantage comparing to those who believed “do not get taken advantage of”, and thus did not procreate and died out
Like first ones would just get taken advantage of all the time, burn out and die miserably.
Second ones would preserve their mental health and be able to achieve anything meaningful like raising kids.
I have no sex :(
Dead relatives must be getting rly thirsty now lol
Do you mean ddg as browser or search engine?
You can open snowflake website in DDG browser
No, I mean, if I want a website to not know who I am? Isn’t Brave or Librewolf with fingerprinting protection and a VPN a valid choice?
I think people shouldn’t be using Tor for daily usage. It just slows down the network for those who actually need it. It would be better if people donated to the Tor project or ran their nodes instead
Isn’t VPN a must-have to avoid IP-tracking without downsides of Tor (slow, Cloudfare etc.)?
And then thoughts like “they are better off without me” and “they care about me only because they pity me” start to kick in…
btw get help ASAP, the longer you wait the harder it will be to fix shit
If you are male, then this video could clarify a bit: https://youtu.be/x3lypVnJ0HM Main point is that twice as many guys want a relationship comparing to gals, so you should really stand out in a quirky way to get noticed
I would not. Why? It won’t fix anything. People would just switch to TikTok or Telegram or something, which is not that much better
Trump only respects strength, so at first no favours, no deals, protect national interests as fiercely as possible no matter the cost.
After enough strength posturing, I think it would be possible to negotiate with Trump and do business without selling off my country completely.
Then just pray we survive until 2029 or Trump dies
Lack of content and lack of recommended page to find content
I really don’t understand people in the comments here. I agree it’s his son’s decision to date whoever they want. However it’s also dad’s right to not push feelings down his throat and spend time with people he does not like.
Why not say “hey son, I respect your romantic choices, but I am not ready to spend time with King yet. i will let you know when this changes”?
Centrism does not mean coming up with a middle-ground solution for all issues. It could be taking a left-leaning stance on one issue, and right-leaning on another.
If we ban centralization then IRC, Signal, Xenforo, vBulletin
Signal is not social media, IRC is an open protocol, isn’t it? I do not know about the rest.
Even when you have federation, each unit in that “web” will usually have a centralized moderation team and administration.
I do not have a problem with that. The problem with centralized social media is that users are locked in to using some specific app because all their friends are there, which makes it harder to switch. This gives monopolies like Facebook an unfair advantage.
Can you suggest a comparable alternative?
I dunno, how Lemmy does this?
Do you mean that they at most should be non-profit? And if so, why?
Yes I mean that. For-profit social media profits from increasing user engagement, even if that means through getting people addicted, intentionally not dealing with misinformation (because misinformation is usually more outrageous and gets people more engaged), data collection and other unethical practices, all because shareholders need the line to go up.
I support blocking commercial, proprietary and centralized social media everywhere.
Do not listen to what people tell you but watch what they do. If society did not tolerate sociopaths, sociopaths wouldn’t govern nations and own multi-billion dollar corporations. This behaviour is not only accepted but encouraged.
By the way I am feeling depressed rn so that’s why I am being so pessimistic, do not take too seriously