Nah, just think people who are ignorant of their own laws should think more before they make their ignorance more widely known.

International law is what the CCP claims gives them the right. So no, I am not implying, I am stating it is relevant. Even if you disagree with the law, how do you expect this to be resolved peacefully without international law?

Let me guess, you don’t think they have a legal claim to the island under UN law?

I mean wasn’t it largely peaceful in the past? From China’s perspective they only need to act if Taiwan or other countries make public statements challenging their legal claim to the island, it is better for China to wait as the power dynamics are shifting in their favor. It is only the west that wants to force this issue to come to head now, while they still have a comparative advantage - but even now if China wants Taiwan there is little we can do keep that from happening (though the humanitarian cost would be staggering and likely hurt their standing internationally).

Edit: I also don’t see why mainland would suddenly pivot on the issue, there’s seems very little reason to expect them to change course.

The primary enabler of fascism is the belief that it is inevitable.

Pssh, mine uses a random number generator for odd numbers to return true 4% of the time to achieve higher accuracy and a bettor LLM metaphor

Time to talk to HR about IBS and a possible medical discrimination lawsuit.

You didn’t define authoritarianism or specifically say how it is so in this case, leaving us to guess and you to say we guessed wrong.

I’m sure the market will innovate and give us rentable biometrics.

A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn’t speed up delivery but slows it down. I don’t see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

And maybe the half bottle of wine I drank. But I definitely didn’t do it on purpose.

… Yes I said I wouldn’t mind if something terrible happened to her, but that isn’t a motive.

Well that and the Father saying he wouldn’t feel bad if something terrible happened to her because he has two better behaved daughters.

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

Americans have a strange youth fetish. I guess that explains Epstein

But if something’s dirty after you touch it The problem is your hands, dipshit Cut it off

Meh, you both deserve each other honestly. Too concerned with being right that we all lost focus of what is good.

But you don’t understand that they’re talking about systems while you’re talking about personal choice.

Big picture is AI not being able to operate under unusual conditions means that the “10 times better” (if it were only true) has a big fucking caveat where we can’t say the stat will hold true if we replace all drivers.

I think more want to be “influencers” because they don’t have any relatives that can give them a small multi-million dollar loan.

For this to be practical you need to audit and control the code the runs in the data center. I think that was a hangup with some Chinese based services that offered to host in the EU.