“We studied 10 Americans and generalized the findings to all humans”
she/they
“We studied 10 Americans and generalized the findings to all humans”
I’ll just send a hurricane to his house.
I did, and this bitch (who’s in a position of power over me) took my joking remark as an opportunity to say climate change is a hoax. He lives in Florida.
I was gonna joke that they must not have friends then, but that’s actually a pretty common problem.
I’d rather hear “you’re weird”, even that’s better than the immediate jump to “you’re a bad person” that’s more common.
I wish people were more willing to say “I don’t understand”.
I yearn for a day user agents can not suck. Backups and syncing should not be this hard!
const is more like C++ constexpr, but static is similar to static from C: it’s a variable that lives outside any scope. Of course, that means the same static can be accessed by multiple threads, so writing to a static is unsafe (except for types like Mutex, you can safely use those to write, but your static won’t be declared mut)
If you made it static, sure, but right now you’re living compiler error
Link-local IPv6 address? smh
But it’s not literally the Holocaust again, so it’s fine /s
I’m trans, god help me…
I can’t seem to find this book
Parts of it seem to be inherently more secure, but there are some pretty glaring holes. At least software distribution is much more secure than the Windows approach.
What’s wrong with GMOs? Poor genetic diversity?
How did you gather she’s offended from that single message? I don’t see any words suggesting that. Perhaps you’re overly defensive right now, and one might say, offended that someone sees things differently to you.
Asides feel more natural to me than weaving it in though. As in, it’s also easier for me to understand if someone uses asides.
My phone’s also stuck in a fastboot loop, gonna need to use Qualcomm’s EDL thing I think :(
Arch Linux is a good vision and a tab for the meds
It feels uncomfortable constantly hearing people justify your value based on your relation to men. I know it doesn’t specify men, but let’s be honest, that’s what everyone thinks of. If you have good intentions, that’s good, but that doesn’t stop the implication that women are only valuable as they relate to men. Intentions do not factor into someone’s frustration hearing it for the millionth damn time! Until that phrase gets reclaimed, it’s gonna have that patriarchal association to most people.