• TLDR to save you from a wall of text - we seem to agree on at least 99% and I’m not even sure what we’re disagreeing about anymore.

    you might see that this was probably death by a million paper cuts.

    Yes, I can easily see that being the case for that user.

    Yeah this a wall of text. To be honest I can’t really spend my already limited time reading 15 paragraphs from someone who ignores relevant points I raise.

    False premise? If you read it you’d have seen that I did not ignore those points but either agreed with or responded to each of them. So, can you spend your “already limited time reading 15 paragraphs from someone [who acknowledges] relevant points” that you raised?

    In this case, I addressed the ban reason given, and yet you try to argue more about it as though I didn’t.

    So this is a bit odd. I disagreed with Monk on a lot, but I never felt that his responses to me ever became uncordial.

    Between you and me, it sounds like we maybe agree on 95% or 99% of the points. And yet, somehow this convo seems to be the one taking a more unfriendly turn.

    Anyways, I wasn’t arguing about the ban reason but attempting clarify that I was speaking against one particular thing w/o disagreeing with the rest.

    If you cared about more than disputing me,

    Sorry, I have a second wall of text you’d have to read. But in that I list out a lot of the different things I care about, and also the why.