• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Still at it… She lost, dude. Go away.

    Yes, we were already hopeless, but we recognized that there was one option (out of the four: Trump, Harris, third party, or abstention) that provided a possible chance of ending the genocide, while the other three were a guarantee of not only the complete elimination of the Palestinian people, but the expansion into a much larger conflict across the Middle East and possibly the world.

    I hope that moral superiority makes you feel better when you see the what the difference between the Democrats and Republicans in Gaza (and beyond) will be. Assuming you actually give a shit.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Pardon my ignorance as a non-American, but which out of the four was the option for (possibly) ending the genocide?

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This might come as a surprise, but the people opposing the genocide did not magically disappear. Almost like they were not a Russian troll farm but real people with morals and values.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      but we recognized that there was one option (out of the four: Trump, Harris, third party, or abstention) that provided a possible chance of ending the genocide

      You hoped, “we” didnt “recognize”. If Harris was going to end it she would have said so in the few days before the election. She proved pretty thoroughly that was never going to stop taking that AIPAC money.