• conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Qualcomm bought nuvia, which had a broad license to use ARM’s IP. They used said IP to make chips.

      ARM claims that the change in ownership somehow invalidates the license and they were required to renegotiate new terms.

      They couldn’t convince a jury because that doesn’t make sense without very specific terms explicitly detailing exactly what conditions nullify their license agreement.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t know why a blanket, terms not transferable upon sale, wouldn’t have covered it, but either that is too broad or didn’t exist in the original Nuvia contract.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s a bullshit argument, practically it’s the same as if Nuvia sold their license to Qualcomm, which they obviously wouldn’t have the right to do.
        I don’t see how Arm lost this suit, they did NOT grant that license to Qualcomm. The judgement seems ridiculous.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            There’s a difference between an order contract an a license.
            The license to make Arm CPU was granted to Nuvia not to Qualcomm.

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I used to do some work with Qualcomm and ARM IP. They both need to die. ARM is holding back all manner of technologies with their absolutely insane and byzantine licensing scheme and Qualcomm is one of the most evil tech companies in existence, you just don’t hear about them because their particular evil is constrained to B2B interactions.