The Grace Hopper Celebration is meant to unite women in tech. This year droves of men came looking for jobs.

  • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tangentially related, but are job fairs even worth it? In my limited experience, you wait in a long line for someone to tell you to apply online. I was better off getting a list of employers who were attending, and then looking through each of their websites.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think I figured it out… only rarely you’d get immediate interviews, but the idea is you get LinkedIn contacts to chat with later and industry insight, and something to tell recruiters/hiring managers that you did, but you dress it up in a way that shows you look for opportunity like “I met members of [industry/company] at a recruiting conference in [town]”. I found industry conferences to be more useful than jobfairs in this respect, but those can be a little to a lot expensive.

      Otherwise it’s pretty much just being told to scan QR codes, business cards and maybe getting a couple plastic cups and pens.

      All in all I say job hunting is such an awful game.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. Mostly you run around collect business cards and then go online to apply for the jobs… that you could have done without going to the job fair in the first place.

      TBH It’s a huge red flag if a recruiter wants upfront payment with no guarantee at the end of it (or even if they ‘guarantee’ one). If the recruiters are so desperate for someone they want to organise a job fair, they can bloody well pay for it themselves.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also watch out for the recruiters who give you a challenge to fulfill just to be considered. It’s free work they are looking for.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      My experience of going to a tech fair was:

      • Great discussion with sourcing recruiter of Big Name Company, who loves CV and experience
      • Get Business Card and told to apply online
      • Apply online
      • Ghosted/immediately rejected.

      They’re basically box-ticking exercises for companies that want to work with specific organisations.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got scammed into attending a seminar for “business women empowering business women.” It was just this lady giving a talk about what a great job coach she is and then pressuring everyone into hiring her for $300 per month. She saw me as a mark and was really targeting me, I actually wrote the check for her first three months and was about to hand it to her, but saw the look in her eyes, looking at my check and realized I should just tear it up.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been on the opposite side. A company I used to work for did a table at a job fair once. The candidates who showed up to talk to us were mostly under qualified for the entry level position we were trying to fill. And by that, I mean that people with zero knowledge, training or experience in our industry. Even one class or a little knowledge might have sufficed.

      We had one guy lingering near our table who really seemed to want to work with us even though his skill set didn’t fit our needs at all and we told him as much. The whole thing was a big waste of time for us, we never did another one after that.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        under qualified for the entry level position we were trying to fill.

        Was it really “entry level” then?

        • tetelestia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If “one class” or “a little knowledge” is enough, then yes, assuming it’s a position with advancement opportunities.

          For a desirable or career type position, showing some initiative is not an unreasonable ask.

        • JonEFive@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. This wasn’t an open “literally anyone can do it” job. It’s entry level as in starting a path to a career. A certain aptitude is definitely necessary.

          Let me ask you this, is a job that requires a two year degree and zero years of experience entry level? Because our requirements were even less than that.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know why you’re trying to convince me, its obvious its not as “entry level” as you thought, ans you cant find employees because the pay is very much “entry level”.

            • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This.

              “Entry-level” is employerese for, “a professional position for which we don’t want to pay a professional rate”.

              Guessing from your username you’ve encountered plenty of hiring managers looking for someone with multiple years experience in their specific niche field on exactly the software they use…for their entry level position that they want to pay less than 2x minimum wage.

              The last time I was job hunting, I thought there had to be a typo so I actually responded to an ad for a CAD drafter to fill an “entry level” position that they wanted ten years of experience to fill.

              I had the experience, so I figured I’d see what was going on. Surely someone along the hiring pipeline had screwed something up

              Nope!

              They really wanted a CAD drafter with a decade of experience for their entry level position to work for like $14/hr.

              When I told them how unrealistic that was, the response was something to the effect of “When we say entry level, we mean it as entry into our company. The pay may seem low but this will give you the opportunity to quickly earn raises as you take advantage of your employment in our great organization!”

              • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They really wanted a CAD drafter with a decade of experience for their entry level position to work for like $14/hr.

                Ha! Good luck with that. You might be able to hire a kid out of high school who got to try solidworks for 30 minutes one afternoon for that much.

                And you’re right, I’ve seen it. One place I talked to had some obscure CAD software I’d never heard of, they wanted someone who could just sit down and use it with no instruction, they were 40 miles from the nearest “major” city, and they wanted to pay $13 per hour, $14 for “the right person”. Nope.

          • systemglitch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It used to be once upon a time. Because companies invested in people and fully trained them themselves.

            Yes I know, times have changed.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            is a job that requires a two year degree and zero years of experience entry level?

            Imo no, though companies use the term “entry level” VERY loosely.

            Many career paths will substitute experience for a degree. But there need to be true entry level jobs to give them that experience.

            It’s okay if you want someone who’s taken classes specific to your field, but I think it’s misleading to then call the job “entry level”.

            • superkret@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So to you, “entry level” is literally just unskilled labor and nothing else?

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sort of. “Unskilled labor” implies a certain job sector. I’m taking about the role that is currently served by internships, temp-to-hire, apprenticeships, on the job certifications, and people who lie about their experience and then underperform while they learn the role.

                I guess I’d say “no prior experience needed” rather than “unskilled labor”. The work itself can be “skilled” but the job applicant isn’t (yet).

                No matter how “skilled” you get at retail, it will always be considered “unskilled labor”. That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the company that takes on a temp worker witg no prior experience, with the possibility of full time hire if they show promise. That’s “entry-level”.

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        >hiring for entry level

        >saying people are underqualified

        The problem is with the companies, not the job seekers. Actually offer true entry level positions, and actually hire the people that apply.

        • JonEFive@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Entry level doesn’t necessarily mean literally anyone can do it. What I meant was basically first job out of college. Except you could apply while you were still in college. If that isn’t entry level, I don’t know what is.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah those sorts of positions are usually locked to college students. So once you graduate you can no longer apply despite those being the positions you’re qualified for.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s been my experience as well. Totally pointless when they just want you to apply online. What’s the use of networking then?

    • serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If recruiters are trying to discriminate, and you have the attributes they’re discriminating in favor of, getting a face-to-face with them can be a way to get your foot in the door that doesn’t leave a paper trail.

      Which really highlights how bad the job market is now. All the recruiters at this job fair are going to share the sentiments the organizers are expressing in this article. They’re there to hire women and are pissed at all the men who showed up, so significantly less likely to hire them… but those dudes are so desperate they still gave it a shot.

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m a woman and wasn’t even at the event. No clue it was going on, and it seems like it’d be far too expensive for me to attend in the first place. If they’re looking for women who are eager to work for them, they’re looking in the wrong place.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which really highlights how bad the job market is now

        I think we should specify, “in tech”. The greater job market is doing fine. Tech has been over hiring and over compensating for years.

    • squirrel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It depends on the job fair. My mid-tier university’s career fair was as you describe. From talking to (women) classmates who attended Grace Hopper on the other hand it sounded very worth it. The lines were short (in the mid 2010s anyway) and many of the companies in attendance were scheduling next-day, single round interviews with job offers sent out by the end of the week. I have no idea if it’s still like that but I can’t say I’m surprised that, given how the tightly pool of entry-level jobs offering visa sponsorships has contracted, affected male students have gotten desperate and shameless enough to try it.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s been my experience as well. Totally pointless when they just want you to apply online. What’s the use of networking then?