• Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    12 days ago

    Let’s be honest, what these apps are going to do is boost user engagement (read: waste your fucking time) by pulling you into conversations with AI chatbots. The longer you’re there, the more advertisements they can feed you. It’s going to be harder and harder to find a real person, because investors don’t benefit from that.

      • Singletona082@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        Ooof. Sorry man. i’d just figured with 95% of the userbase being male. It’s gotta be a decent spot for gay hookups.

        • boxfulloffoxes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Well, me in particular it’s the whole gay AND disabled thing. But in broader terms: still lots of scammers to watch out for, lots of flakes (even if you’re only looking for a hookup), varies WILDLY by area (mine is mostly tractor riding DL types last time I checked), etc. Not bad, but not super either.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah. When they had to fight for their user base. Even Tinder was reasonably usable couple of years ago. It paired me with my current partner which must be considered a marvel of technology.

      • Trex202@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yes, but by pairing you, it lost 2 users! That’s counterintuitive to capitalism.

        So if the AI works for the users, it will bring down the app.

        If the AI works for the investors, people will get bad pairings and it will bring down the app.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah the OG OKCupid was incredible. Then it was bought out and became another swiping app.

        • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Yes, they had a system where you answered questions about a wide range of topics, and answered what the ideal mate should say, then give a weight to how important that is for you. For example, you prefer chocolate over vanilla, and you want your mate to be the same, but it’s not an important factor. On the other hand, you prefer not to be a nazi, and it’s super important your mate isn’t one either. Also, there were IQ questions which allowed filtering out the stupid ones (like is the sun or the earth larger). Then the system would recommend profiles based on a match score computed from your answers. Really great. Got two relationships out of it, one is going 10 years today.

          • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 days ago

            Adding onto this, it was totally free and you could just endlessly scroll through profiles, read them, look at their answers to questions, etc. No need to say “yes” or “no” to each profile judt to see the next one. And if you answered all of the personality questions (there were hundreds if not thousands) you were invited to become a site mod, which I did.

    • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      I went on something like 50 dates with people that I found on online dating sites. This was between 2005 and 2007 (when I met my wife via Yahoo Personals.)

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            12 days ago

            And that’s the point. When it works, they lose 2 customers forever.

            It’s a filtering process that removes all the diamonds in the rough. All that’s left is the rough.

            • Obi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I mean that’s definitely true and all, but wouldn’t they also get a continuous fresh supply of single people (coming of age, breakups). Don’t get me wrong I totally get they want that and to keep the users hooked as well, because they’re greedy piggys, but still I don’t know if the business model is doomed if they don’t.

              • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                The issue is if those new singles enter the rough zone (full of people who have not had much success) they’re going to have a very bad experience. Probably the best experience is for then to pair off against other new singles and depart. Some will end up doing that but others will end up stuck in the mud like everyone else.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Is your new AI gay?

    We have the first Gay AI app in existence and we need you!

    You’ll be able to communicate to other gay AIs in your IP range neighborhood this Wednesday! For free! Between 5pm and 5:05pm, when the moon is directly overhead.