abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square136linkfedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down124cross-posted to: python@programming.dev
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comabhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square136linkfedilinkcross-posted to: python@programming.dev
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoYou can make that assumption at your own peril.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·18 days agoI don’t think they are a minority
minus-squareiAvicenna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoIf anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.
You can make that assumption at your own peril.
I don’t think they are a minority
If anything len tells you that it is a sequence or a collection, “not” does not tell you that. That I feel like is the main point of my objection.