• drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      …letting an authoritarian state gain more power and influence?..

      That’s one weird argument. Are you implying that meddling with other state’s affairs is justified if it’s to keep it from gaining power and influence?

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s one weird argument. Are you implying morality stops at borders?

        And it’s not even meddling, they are asking for help.

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you implying morality stops at borders?

          Kind of, yeah. A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

          And it’s not even meddling, they are asking for help.

          I’m okay with helping Ukraine. I’m not okay if it’s helping only to fuck with Russia.

          • ammonium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            A moral cause in one country can be an evil wrongdoing in other. Case in point - Al-Qaeda was formed because US troops were deployed in some country in the middle east to defend someone.

            Uhm, where did you get that from?

            Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn’t really stop at borders for most people.

            I’m okay with helping Ukraine. I’m not okay if it’s helping only to fuck with Russia.

            If it’s to stop an authoritarian state from taking over a democratic state it’s good for me. If it’s because of other less ulterior motives (and let’s not kid ourselves, it’s at least partly because of that), I don’t mind. Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

            • drathvedro@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uhm, where did you get that from?

              Actually, I messed up. I thought al-Quaeda was created in response to US’s invasion of Iraq, but it was actually formed a couple years earlier in response to Soviet-Afghan war. Still, the point stands as the guys got very offended by western forces presence on what they considered holy land

              Is it bad when a doctor only saves lives because it pays well?

              It would be very bad if the doctor is some kind of pervert who is only treating patients as a cover up for his obsession

              Anyway, I get your point, but your example only shows that morality doesn’t really stop at borders for most people.

              The point is, morality doesn’t stop, but can be different across (abeit, blurry) cultural, religious, political or ideological lines. The US and allies cross a little more of those than Russia in this conflict, but that’s a topic I’d rather not dive into. What I’m arguing here is against Putin’s rhetoric which tells that “The only thing the collective west wants is to destroy Russia”, so…

              let’s not kid ourselves, it’s at least partly because of that

              I’d advise at least pretending that it’s not and it’s just being “the good guys”. Fuckers like RT, Z-bots and other scum often take such comments and blow them into loudhailers to rally the support for the war. Trust me, “these guys just want to fuck you over” is quite a convincing argument. Besides, there’s plenty of other reasons to support Ukraine

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reason I’m said this because it sounds like “preventing Russia from prospering is a good cause”, as if we’re still at cold war or something. Probably not what you’ve meant, just pointing at possible confusion in interpretation. Helping a little guy, sure, but helping only to fuck the big guy is what Putin was rambling about in his justifications about war.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Helping other democracies defeat authoritarian invaders is absolutely worth fucking all of the invaders “affairs”

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Helping other X defeat Y invaders is absolutely worth fucking all of the invaders “affairs”"

          Try with different X and Y. See where it gets you.

    • stella@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t know what the sunk cost fallacy is.

      You seem to have this idea that Ukraine can win the war if the US gives enough support.

      Do you think it’s possible for Ukraine to lose even if they got all the information and equipment the US was able to give?