• MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hard agree. My takeaway is the moral of the story is always do quality engineering. There have been like 10 movies and they still don’t know how to construct an enclosure.

    • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why do they always only have one massive entrance to each enclosure? Why is it large enough for the Dinosaur to walk out of? Why don’t they have two doors in series, airlock style?

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Where I’m from, when engineers complete their certification they get an iron ring made from the material of a collapsed bridge. This is remind them to not become arrogant and think about everything that could go wrong.

      You wouldn’t be able to find a good engineer to design a park for animals no one really knows the behaviour of. Hammond would have to hire the people in this thread who think “yeah we could design something that will contain these animals, no problem at all!”

      • lividweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s actually a persistent myth. I’ve heard it myself as a wearer of an iron ring, but it isn’t true. The myth was that the first iron rings were made from the remains of the first Quebec Bridge, but they weren’t, let alone any over the century since. The bridge collapse did inspire the creation of the iron rings, though.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wasn’t the issue with Indominus rex that the dinosaur tricked them into thinking it was gone and they left the door open, like idiots? Definitely some things in those movies are engineering issues, but it mostly was a problem because there were multiple points of failure in the system. This is the point I make about my work. My department catches behavior problems from reports, discussions, interviews, and providing technical assistance. We do tons of work regularly and there are overlapping ways to catch the same problem. When my department is given more work and no new staff, they can’t stay on top of everything. They still catch things because the work they are able to do usual catches one of the multiple opportunities. With enough workload added on eventually you end up missing something. When the stakes are life and death, you have multiple layers of protection programmed into the system.