• down daemon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pirate and buy official merch, they make more of that anyway. Also live shows

      • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just because you liked that in 2000 doesn’t mean that two decades later, it’s still ideal.

        • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not ideal but artists get paid proper. Just don’t share then you’re mostly fine.

          P.S.: Subject to your local law which may prohibits ripping a CD. This is NOT a legal advise.

          Edit: I don’t know if my statement is right or not given the downvotes. Can someone explain?

    • ashe@lemmy.starless.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Buying the music and selfhosting a streaming server is an option, though obviously not for everyone

      • desconectado@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Spotify user, I’m not really ok with how much they pay artists… But I don’t use Spotify for “streaming”, I use it to discover new music, find obscure bands, their algorithm is amazing at that.

        I could easily selfhost as you suggested, but then it would be my own music bubble.

        I go to concerts and buy merchandise as much as possible when I want to support an artist.

      • ejmin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can confirm. Tidal has “lossless” audio, but app is horrendous, albeit better than Spotify’s.

        Also tech support is absolutely useless, still would prefer over Spotify every time.

    • ExcessiveAardvark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      7digital has a reasonable selection, but it’s not all available lossless, which would be almost incomprehensible in 2023 if it wasn’t for the fact that we’re talking about the music industry.

    • DavidGA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple Music pays more than Spotify. It’s probably still not “decent”, but it’s more.

      • TurtledUp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        China and doesn’t spy on your phone, I’ll take things that don’t go together for 200 Alex

          • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            at the very least, I expect it to make requests for every song you’re streaming which are associated with your account and payment information.

            they also get your music consuming habits, because they know the times you listen to music and to which music at each time.

            that’s a hell lot of data to analyze and sell.

            • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              As if Spotify and other services don’t lmao.

              Spotify even dug your bluetooth device name.

              • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                definitely. You’re absolutely right, Spotify is a privacy nightmare and I didn’t say otherwise.

                The post I was replying to was arguing that the service they were using was private, I just told them that even if the app doesn’t need any permissions they still have the ability to spy on their users and most probably do so.