A group tracking antisemitism in Germany said Tuesday that it documented a drastic increase of antisemitic incidents in the country in the month after Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7.

The RIAS group said it recorded 994 incidents, which is an average of 29 incidents per day and an increase of 320% compared to the same time period in 2022. The group looked at the time period from Oct. 7 to Nov. 9.

Among the 994 antisemitic incidents, there were three cases of extreme violence, 29 attacks, targeted damage to 72 properties, 32 threats, four mass mailings and 854 cases of offensive behavior.

Many Jews in Germany experienced antisemitic incidents in their everyday lives and even those who weren’t exposed to any antisemitic incidents reported feelings of insecurity and fear, said RIAS, which is an abbreviation in German for the Department for Research and Information on Antisemitism.

  • theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jewish people are attacked on the streets, synagogues are being attacked and smeared with swastikas etc.
    You can condemn that and still think Israel is making a mistake in Gaza.

    • Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is absolutely true. Antisemitism is on the rise in many places. At the same time some organizations (like the ADL) mark everything anti zionist as antisemitist. This muddies the water and takes away from the actual stuff some people have to go through with antisemitism. Their stories deserve to be heard and not getting drowned out by claims that have nothing to do with antisemitism.

      I don’t think the OP you’re replying to means to say that antisemitism isn’t on the rise, it’s just hard to know how much is actual antisemitism and how much is marked as antisemitism when it’s just criticism of Zionism and/or the state of Israel.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ADL has been calling the demonstrations by Jewish Voice for Peace anti-Semitic. I don’t doubt there’s a rise of incidents, but it’s always a good idea to look at who’s providing the numbers and what they consider an incident.

      • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        how do u differentiate antizionism and antisemitism? jews have the right to live buuuut… not in Israel? please enlighten me

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Zionism isnt “jews have the right to live”. Its “jews have a divine right to land where people were already living so they kill and exile them”

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “kill and exile” part is not necessarily part of it (see e.g. Labour Zionism, Rabin was one of them) but granted the right-wing nutjobs have pretty much appropriated that label outside of Israel itself.

            Oh speaking about divine right: There’s also religious Antizionism, those people equate anything Zionist to trying to force the prophecy of the third temple and therefore as heretical.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              oh I’ve seen a lot about labor zionism learning about the history of zionism in general. The kibbutzim, the jewish land funds, the buying up of land from colonial land owners and eviction of Palestinians, long before Israeli statehood. Look at the occupation in the West Bank for what Labor Zionism looks like. And what the kibbutzim at the Gaza border are waiting to do to Gaza.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                And what the kibbutzim at the Gaza border are waiting to do to Gaza.

                Going in and helping in all kinds of humanitarian ways? At least that’s what they did before Hamas slaughtered them all, it’s a very lefty region.

                Look at the occupation in the West Bank for what Labor Zionism looks like.

                Imagine Rabin not getting assassinated and the Oslo accords going into force. That’s what Labor Zionism could’ve looked like.

                And don’t get me wrong I won’t defend everything every Labour Zionist has ever done, either. My position is actually quite simple: Fascists on both sides are fucking it up for everyone. And no matter your gripes with any particular Labour Zionist thing, fascists they are fucking not.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  do you think the humanitarian situation in Gaza was good? International Humanitarian organizations were pleading with Israel to let them do humanitarian work in the open air prison that is Gaza. I think Israel has been lying to you about how they’ve been handling Gaza, it has not been humanitarian in any way.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The situation wasn’t just not good, it was atrocious. But also no, the Israelis going in and and helping weren’t the Israeli government blockading it, same as Israelis helping West Bank Palestenians with the olive harvest so they don’t get shot at by settlers aren’t the IDF turning a blind eye to settlers shooting Palestinians.

                    Maybe, just for a second, consider that Israel is not a hive mind.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                By a religious Zionist, yes. And guess who back then variously called for, didn’t push back against calls for, etc, his assassination: The current prime minister as well as the minister of national security.

                As to more of those: You know the type of Jews living close to the west bank going in helping Palestinians with the olive harvest so that they’re less likely to get shot at by settlers (because hurting Israelis would get them in trouble)? Many of those types also lived near the Gaza border, helping as they can, it’s a region full of old hippie kibbutzim. And then Hamas came. Which gives yet another spin on why the Israeli government isn’t terribly worried about the hostages: Most of them are leftists.

                Generally speaking the average Israeli is left of centre, in its core it’s a socdem country. After the failure of the Oslo accords a lot, a lot a lot of them bought the right-wing promise for safety, the “antagonise until they give up” path, but otherwise stayed centre left. As I think the Haaretz put it: “Yigal Amir [the assassin] has won”. But then with the right wing now having proved that they can’t provide safety their days in government are absolutely numbered, Netanyahu is not popular in Israel right now. They won’t go for naive hippie kumba-ya, either, but a Realpolitik “keep the checkpoints, get rid of the settlements, stop antagonising and put the fucking Kahanites in padded cells” policy is currently definitely a vote-winner.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              the right-wing nutjobs have pretty much appropriated that label outside of Israel itself.

              Considering the “settler” violence in the West Bank (backed by the Israeli military), it sure seems like they’ve appropriated it inside of Israel itself, too.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Some Israelis - not all. The current government is absolutely zionist and there is a decent portion of the population that is aligned with that… but, to my knowledge, the majority of Israelis don’t demand a one state solution. And it’s absolutely true that the majority of jews don’t advocate for that.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’ve cornered state power by having found a willing stirrup holder (Netanyahu) whose only interest nowadays is staying in power to avoid going to prison for corruption and therefore able to form a coalition with the right-wingest of right-wing fascist fucks (people like Ben Gvir, who didn’t get drafted as the IDF ruled him to be too extremist to serve). But label-wise, no, they don’t equate Zionism with Kahanites and general ilk. Roughly like other countries don’t equate patriotism with fascism.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              from the beginnings of Zionism? No, no they largely came from Europe, when Britain colonized the area after World War I. It’s pretty fucked up, Britain promised Arab independence in Palestine if they revolted against the Ottoman colonizers during WWI, but then issued the Balfour Declaration promising a Jewish state there instead.

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s such an incredibly reduced “summary” that you can as well call it false. But in your eyes good and evil are strictly defined. Must be nice (for you). Sadly, that’s neither helpful, nor good, nor a solution.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whats false is the idea that they were already there. Its kind of a weird thing to believe, i feel like you’d be pretty well aware of the famous Jewish diaspora. Theres a reason over 700 thousand palestinians were killed or exiled and it wasnt to make room for people already living there.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What makes it “false” is that it deliberately leaves out multiple other factors that do not fit your narrative of “Israel = evil Jewish colonizers from Europe” and “Palestinians = poor victims being oppressed”.

                    Directly neighbouring Arab and Muslim countries and areas exiled, killed and drove out Jews amounting to more than 850 thousand who went to Israel.

                    That the people who we call Palestinians today in the area denied the two-state solution at that time because they did not want Israel to exist. They wanted to rather have war instead of getting their own state and share the land.

                    The animosity and multiple wars that were started against Israel for purely religious and ideologic reasons from the other side as well. The religious zealots aren’t only on Israel’s side.

                    There are numerous countries that came into existence by wars and in a similar way as Israel. It’s even less of an issue here because it’s not even a part of a country which declared independence, there wasn’t even a country in the first place!

                    Israel did not come into existence just because of Zionism. About half of the Jews in Israel are Mizrahim who are native to the area. They had an inferior status in the Islamic society. By your own logic it is understandable that they ultimately pushed back and declared independence after being treated as second class people for generations.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If that gives them a right to exile Palestinians it gives hamas the right to fight back because so were Palestinians.

          • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            I can also define words however I want and change facts to make my bias sound not crazy

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              feel free to bring in any definitions for zionism you can find that just call it a right to live. Heck, look up why it’s called Zionism. It’s about Jews establishing a nation around Jerusalem. Palestinians were and still are living there already during this movement. hundreds of thousands have been killed or exiled.

                • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, “palestinian” doesn’t mean muslim… there were plenty of palestinian jews.

                  The difference is that palestinian jews were allowed to integrate into Israel while palestinian muslims were not.

                • blazera@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I do still want you to go find definitions for zionism. And look into the history while you’re at it. There was no notable amount of jews in Palestine at the time, it was a long established largely islamic arabic people. Jews were famously a diaspora, which means not living in that area. Zionists largely moved in from Europe.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jews are people, Israel is a colonial entity. The abolishment of Israel as a state does not mean the death of its inhabitants.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So you people actually want Israel to be gone? Where shall all the Israelis go, in your opinion? And why do the Israelis have less of a right for a country than the Palestinians?

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well first generation settlers should definitely move back to their homes, wherever they have citizenship and it’s feasible (not refugees etc).

              But as for the rest I never said expel everyone in Israeli occupied territory. I said abolish the state. They can still live there, but not under a genocidal ethnostate in which you have higher status for being a member of one faith.

              Land will have to be redistributed, and reparations paid as well.

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Who is supposed to pay those reparations if Israel doesn’t exist anymore and there are no Israelis?

                How are the Jews supposed to protect themselves from the people who want them out of the country or dead (which is the reason why Israel came into existence in the first place)?

                What kind of state do you think Palestine would be? Or is it okay to have a Muslim ethnostate but not a Jewish one?

                • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  there are no Israelis

                  Never said all the people currently there had to leave

                  protect themselves from the people who want them out of the country or dead

                  Maybe when they’re not stealing Palestinian land and genociding Palestinians, there wouldn’t be so much animosity.

                  What kind of state do you think Palestine would be?

                  One representative of those that live there, a mix.

          • Iceblade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I am curious, how would genocide of non-muslims and LGBT individuals along with religious oppression of women be prevented in your suggested scenario where the state of Israel is abolished?

            It is possibly the most diverse nation on planet Earth, and a beacon of personal liberties, stability and democracy when compared to other MENA countries (if you disagree here, please do give a counter-example!)

              • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think brainwashed circlejerkimg is the problem highlighted in this thread, but to each his own

            • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think they mean they just share the land with the Palestinians, the people who they threw out when they got there.

              If the US can manage it with African Americans or Native Americans, or South Africa can manage it post apartheid, or the UK can manage it after the Troubles, I think it’s possible. It won’t be easy, but it’s worth the work to stop the violence.

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                People are really uneducated about how Israel came into existence. This is a country from a group of people who already lived there. It wasn’t external conquerers who came to the land.

                • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It was external settlers generally, especially starting around the Law of Return being a thing. Wikipedia and other sources says about 50% come from Europe and Russia, and the other generally from the surrounding Middle Eastern countries once Israel became a thing and started calling people towards it. Even today, lots of people immigrate there from Europe or the US.

                  Are you talking from thousands of years ago? That’s a strange justification to kick people out of their houses in the last 70 years, but I am down to read other sources if you’ve got them. I am admittedly still pretty new to this whole subject.

                  • Iceblade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Just calling them settlers would be ignoring a huge part of history, and missing out on a lot of nuance - as would calling them natives of the area. Some certainly were, but many, if not most were refugees to varying degrees.

                    To any reader, keep in mind this is not intended as a moral judgement in any direction, rather an important historic context to the situation. It’s a long read.

                    My writing of this context begins, loosely, in the 19th century. Jews are an almost omnipresent and incredibly diverse minority culture in Europe and have been persecuted to varying degrees for more than a millenia. This persecution has however usually been less systematic and more spontaneous. That changed with concepts such as nationalism, nation-states and more centralised governments.

                    Minority cultures were considered a detriment to national unity, and hence more “formalised” discussion of “the Jewish Question” (yes, the one the NSDAP in the 20th century attempted to “solve”) entered the European political discourse. Keep in mind, jews were far from the only persecuted group. Roma, for instance, was another, along with many local groups such as the Basque, Sapmi and Tatars.

                    It was in this enviroment that an idea sprung up among jewish intellectuals, that of Zionism. There are many different opinions on the motives behind it, but the goal was a jewish homeland, where they could be free from persecution. British Mandatory Palestine, heralded as the home of the jewish people in religious texts became the dream. Long before that “Shana Haba’ah B’Yerushalayim” (“Next year in Jerusalem”) had been a commonly used phrase during passover. Europeans invented and enforced nationalism, and Zionism became the jewish dream of their own nation, free from persecution. A trickle of jews to Israel would begin, but the events of the 20th century would turn that trickle into a flood.

                    Antisemitism continues to proliferate during the early 20th century and the German NSDAP (commonly known as the Nazi Party) would take things to the next level. Following 1933, Jews would attempt to flee Germany, sensing impending doom, yet be refused visas almost wherever they turned (with a few notable exceptions). The Western World was perfectly content to stand by and watch as Germany slowly commenced the horrors, and send back those desperate refugees who pleaded for their lives to their doom. On a personal note, I wonder if Germany would have been allowed to complete their genocide, had it not been for them starting yet another World War.

                    I will not elaborate on the Holocaust of WW2. I expect that you all are familiar, and if not, do yourselves a service and read about it.

                    The aftermath of it was just as gruesome. Nobody had wanted the jewish refugees before the war, and nobody wanted the “few” hundred thousands of survivors either. So, they were kept in camps. They had lost their homes, their posessions, most of their loved ones, along with any trust they had had for their local communities which had sent them off to die at the hands of Nazis.

                    Many of the refugees before, during and in the aftermath of WW2 would make their way to Israel, where burgeoning jewish communities would welcome them - pooling their resources along with using aid from mainly american jews to purchase land and build homes for them. The British were keeping the peace - and attempting to prevent the influx of people. This along with growing jewish communities meant freedom from persecution (mostly).

                    The British kept the peace, until they didn’t. I won’t elaborate on the details here as I would prefer to avoid controversy. Besides, I’d have to double the length of this text to just scratch the surface. The summary is that the State of Israel came into existence, born with a collective memory of the recent holocaust and a determination to never let it happen again, along with a huge dose of distrust against much of the Western World. Whatever the reasons, the law of return is implemented. I’d like to think it was an act of compassion, a reaction to the fact that jews had nowhere to go before, during or after the holocaust.

                    One would’ve hoped that the story ended there, but no.

                    In the aftermath of the war, and following other Arab-Israeli wars anti-semitism would blossom further in the Arab world, alongside Islamic Arab nationalism. With varied reasons, some of their own volition and some displaced, a mass exodus of jews occurred from Arab countries, some 80% of which moved to Israel, many without any of their possessions. By 2019 the number of Jews in Arab countries was less than 13’000 and 15’000 in Turkey, compared to a rough million people who were living there in 1948.

                    In the communist Bloc, antisemitism continued under soviet rule, continuing the ancient Russian traditions of pogroms. Despite efforts to prevent jewish emigration from Warsaw Pact communist republics, many managed to escape. When the bloc fell in the 90s, many more would find their way to Israel.

                    For those of you who read this far, thank you and I hope you found it informative and/or interesting. It is not the story of Israel, but rather that of a people who have been persecuted for a long, long time, and still, to a somewhat lesser degree, is being persecuted.

                    [Redacted]

                    The historical context makes the ongoing situation even more tragic, and I sincerely hope that there will be some sort of peaceful resolution.

                    E: removed some possibly personal info

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    What about the approximately 20 % Palestinian Israelis? And do all of the Israelis have to disappear somehow and look for a place to live in other countries? Or only those who are first generation immigrants? Are you against immigration in general, btw?

                    “Kick people out of their homes”, so are you talking about the illegal settlements in the Westbank now?

                    You could start reading about in on Wikipedia.

    • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      u sound reasonable enough, may I ask what in your honest opinion Israel should do instesd in gaza?

      • theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s really damn complicated. There is so much history to this conflict. I honestly don’t know what Israel’s best move would be.
        I just think there has to be a way to have less civilian casualties. People are suffering greatly in Gaza and it somehow needs to stop.
        On the other hand I understand that the Israeli government has to react to the Hamas attacks. Hundreds of innocents were slaughtered and Israel is surrounded by enemies. Constantly in danger. They need to make sure nobody else dares to attack.

        In a perfect world they would (or rather: could) treat Gaza like the US treated Germany after WWII. But I’m afraid even with massive humanitarian and economic help there would still be terror and violence from Hamas. This conflict is too old and too dogmatic to be solved in a matter of weeks or even years.

        Look around in this thread - even people who don’t have any personal stakes in the conflict have such radical options about it. I can’t imagine what it must feel like to be a Palestinian or Israeli who has lost family members to this.

        • idiocracy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          the most honest and down to earth answer I’ve seen tbh.

          I think most people in this and every other thread on the conflict have no stakes in it, and not enough knowledge on the issue and that’s the problem having such strong opinions on it.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering how well the temporary ceasefire is going, extending that to permanent would be a great first step. Then maybe begin real negotiations on how to move forward without Israel continuing to control the region and deciding who deserves to live and where. Sure dealing with terrorism is complicated but realizing that you’re increasing the recruitment rates with every bombing is pretty basic.

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is supposed to be done about the rockets shot at Israel and about the terrorist attacks?

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Admonish and forgive. If you require a proportional response to every action you’ll inevitably exist in a state of perpetual war.

                  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s the thing about hatred and forgiveness, at some point it was always highly personal. Reparations certainly need to be made but Palestine has been starved of money and doesn’t have much to give. Isreal will have to forgive some of these most recent ills if the country is going to move forward peacefully.