• dwalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It was an example. You are missing the point.

    The point is: if a state has in its base law a preference for one religion over another, it can never call itself secular. Even if they teach evolution in schools.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It doesn’t, though. None of its laws are preferential or exclusive. What you linked above isn’t a law that restricts anyone.

      And if you’re curious, should a right-wing government there impose those laws, id wholeheartedly support reforms.