So, in the mind of this one anarcho-capitalist, you should only have the right to protest if you have enough money. My surprise is limitless and my jaw has broken the whole floor.
protesters: WE ARE HUNGRY
government: oops, that’s gonna cost you
I mean… at least Milei is true to his beliefs. It sound like he didn’t try to block the protest, but he is trying to have them pay for the expenses.
only rich assholes being protected by the fascists think it’s a good idea for the government to charge people to protest… fascists have no beliefs… they have power and the ability to bully anyone who disagrees with them…
Yes, how very feudal of him.
Expenses for the services the protestors didn’t order. That doesn’t look like in accordance with his marketing campaign.
Yes, we can read.
Anarchy forever… or… at least 'till I get to power!
Not surprised.
The Minister of Human Capital reminded the population that whoever blocks the street will not get paid any money on their social plans
Why? Because people were and have historically been forced to march/protest here by social organizations. No one can force you to march. The social organizations will be audited (because the picketer leaders STEAL the money they manage and instead of giving the plan to the people, they keep it for themselves, THAT’S WHY THE INTERMEDIARIES HAVE TO BE TERMINATED AND THE PLAN MUST BE TERMINATED). GO DIRECTLY TO THE PEOPLE WHO NEED IT.
REMEMBER: Social organizations (the intermediaries of the Polo Obrero, Movimiento Evita, Barrios de pie, etc.) do not have the power to remove plans.
Demonstrating is a right, but it is also a right to move freely through Argentine territory to go to the workplace/manage health/security emergencies/etc.
Those who promote, instigate, organize or participate in the street blockages will lose all types of dialogue with the Ministry of Human Capital.
The only ones who are not going to get paid for their social plan are those who go to the march and block the street/roads: The one who blocks the street does not get paid.
Beneficiaries of social plans can REPORT to 138 if their plan is cut for not attending a march or if they are threatened with cutting it. Also through the MI ARGENTINA app.
All in all pretty normal stuff
This site does not pass community guidelines for reliability: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-telegraph/
He’s taking over a country drained by kirchnerism for years, of course people are hungry…
This recipe repeats all over latin america, left governments fuck the country over for 10+years, the moment they get voted out. Hur Durr it’s all because this new guy… Argentina, Venezuela, Bolivia. The only reason Brasil didn’t suffer from this is because their economy is much stronger than the rest of Latin America.
Evolution of Bolivia’s GDP per capita. Evo Morales became president in 2006.
Evolution of Brazil’s GDP per capita. Lula was president from 2003 to 2011.
Evolution of Chile, Argentina and Venezuela’s GDP per capita. Chavez was president from 1999 to 2013, Bachelet (Chile) was president from 2006 to 2010 (as well as later, after this graph), the Kirchner ruled in Argentina from 2003 to late 2015.
I don’t think anyone is going to argue that the left is perfect, but most leftist governments in South America in the last two decades have been positive, with Maduro’s being a pretty blatant exception.
