While conducting research on how AI was changing daily work at a U.S. technology company, UC Berkeley Haas doctoral student Xingqi Maggie Ye noticed a pattern that raised a provocative question: What if AI is intensifying work rather than reducing it? Ye’s eight-month ethnographic study, co-authored by Associate Professor Aruna Ranganathan and featured in Harvard […]
There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn’t understand the topic and couldn’t tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out.
A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary.
There was someone at work who was using read.ai for technical discussion and the few summaries I read were like someone who didn’t understand the topic and couldn’t tell what details were important. We would summarize the decisions and next steps and each one had at least one really important thing changed or left out.
A transcription getting words wrong but still phonetically right is still more helpful than a misleading summary.
Now I understand the last part. Agreed, something deeply specialized could be in danger here. I had corpo speak in mind writing the previous messages