• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I know Patriot missiles are relevant to traditional airframes… But aren’t they completely irrelevant when it comes to drones? I’m pretty sure each missile costs at least 1000x the price of what it’s most likely to be aimed at.

    Edit: at four million a missile it’s closer to 10000 or 100000x

    • Wilshire@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Patriots are part of a layered air defense system that focuses on more valuable targets, whereas smaller air defense systems and units intercept UAVs.

      Example

    • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      These aren’t for the small disposable drones. They’re for other missles and large aircraft. For the missles in particular, you should also factor in the potential cost of the damage they’ll cause if not intercepted.

    • aleq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      4 000 000 a missile, 100 000x times more expensive than a military drone? what military drone costs $40?

      I don’t know what models are in use today, but a Bayraktar TB2 costs 4 million.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Ukrainians and houthis are having successful attacks with consumer drones that have hand grenades or ieds taped to them. You don’t need a “military grade” drone to fly an explosive where it shouldn’t be

        • Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You aren’t going to take out an arms warehouse, a bridge, or anything of tactical meaningfulness with a grenade drone.

          They are good for taking out soft targets but that’s about it. Their use is extremely limited as grenades are only good as anti-personnel weapons.

          Comparing them to Patriot missiles is silly. Different uses.

          They wouldn’t use Patriot missiles on targets where grenades are effective.

          • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            A block of c4 is as easily taped to a drone as a grenade and that will take out the targets you mentioned.

            • Coreidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              A block of C4 would put maybe dents in the type of targets that Patriot missiles are designed for.

              You also need to be within vicinity of your target to be able to operate a drone, which a missile doesn’t need.

              Drones can be easily jammed. Missiles aren’t easily jammed, not with the same tech stack needed for drone jamming.

              Apples and oranges. Different targets, different engagements, different applications entirely.

              • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m not saying they replace Patriot missiles, obviously that’s not the case. I’m just saying you can cause a lot of damage with a $100 dollar drone and some c4, pretty similar damage to a $400,000 missile. The missiles aren’t really showing their cost-impact ratios to be good if what the Russians are spending on Ukraine is to be taken as evidence

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Don’t forget scouting. Giving soldiers in the field the ability to poke one over a hill can be useful. A $25 FPV drone off Amazon can do that job if that’s all you can afford.

            Not that you’d use a Patriot against that, either.

          • Cinner@lemmy.worldB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            soft targets

            now that’s a multiple meaning I can get behind. soft, pudgy, vodka filled targets.

      • nekandro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Both Russia and Ukraine are heavily reliant on consumer drones from the likes of DJI. Those run in the 1000-4000 dollar range.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does Russia even have 1000 operational aircraft at this point?

    • Tosti@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are also used against hypersonic missiles the Russians have (kinzal etc.) and ballistics like s300 and s400.

      • 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You might want to put the hypersonic part in quotes, they’re basically just really expensive ballistic missiles that fly slightly faster. Considering their price tag, Russia would have probably been better off never developing them anyways

        • Tosti@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, but afaik the hypersonic term applies to weapons over mach 4. NATO also adds additional requirements for hypersonics, such as manourerability. But they have enough speed to qualify.

            • Tosti@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes exactly, also each icmb would qualify (during re-entry they also pickup “some” speed)… but it seems like hypersonic is sort of a marketing sticker thing, like “green” and “low fat”.

              The NATO hypersonics that are being worked on should be able to make evasive manouvera at speed, will be interesting to see.

        • Tosti@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes they are, but in this conflict the Russians reconfigured some of them and use them in a ground to ground attackrole.

          They had shortages of other tactical weapons and apparently a nice stockpile of these missiles.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Kinda feels like we should add a 0 to that, given the jiggery-pokery that China is also getting up to these days. I’m sure Taiwan wouldn’t mind a few shipments of the anti-ballistic variants.

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      10,000 missile x 4 million dollars = 4 billion dollars. Maybe this is why I stopped checking how expensive war is, it makes it more depressing when we talk numbers.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Taiwan has seven Patriot batteries. For reference, Ukraine initially got two Patriots, and a third one in December. They have to cover a lot more territory than Taiwan, but they’ve basically shut down Russian missile attacks. Including Russia’s hypersonic missile, which is a very important datapoint for military planners to know.