The targeting of another U.S.-owned commercial ship Wednesday shows the militant group remains intent on continuing its attacks in the face of multiple rounds of U.S. military airstrikes.

The Houthis launched anti-ship ballistic missiles at the U.S.-owned, flagged and operated commercial ship Maersk Detroit as it was transiting the Gulf of Aden, according to a statement from the U.S. Central Command. The U.S. Navy destroyer USS Gravely shot down two missiles and a third fell into the water. There were no indications of damage or injuries in the attack.

The U.S. military has been conducting airstrikes against the Houthis to degrade their capabilities since Jan.11, after several weeks of attacks on commercial ships by the militant group.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    I do think this is a strategic miss step from the Hooti Bros. Attacking global trade is the fast track to be on the wrong end of universally approved military actions .

    …and I have a horrible feeling Iran might just be about to order in some Freedom & Democracy . US and UK are in election cycles, and tough looking leaders win votes .

    • BOMBS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Now that you mentioned the freedom and democracy order, I wonder if there’s a connection with Biden sending the CIA director to Israel supposedly for peace negotiations.

    • lemmerguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are militant group so do you think they care, or are sophisticated to think about all this?

    • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maersk said both vessels carried cargo belonging to the U.S. Defense and State Departments, as well as other government agencies, meaning they were “afforded the protection of the U.S. Navy for passage through the strait.”

      • gnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not being able to afford it has never deterred the US from taking military action.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        lol Ukraine is a bargain. I think the US has spent maybe 2% of the entire military budget supplying Ukraine with weapons. In exchange we get to see the last large generation of Russians turned into fertilizer along with all of their frontline hardware.

        Israel is perfectly capable of turning the Gaza Strip into a moonscape without much support from the US.

        The US hasn’t even touched the hardware needed to take on China (long range missiles and aircraft). On top of that we now have a west that is more united than ever behind the American Hegemony.

        I think the US can afford to let a few off the chain and rain some good old fashioned freedom on a few Houthis.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Comment is being reported, but I don’t really see anything actionable here. My only request would be to please not minimalize the Houthi movement by calling them “Hoothies”, I mean it’s spelled correctly right there in the subject.

        Going down the low hanging fruit road starts butting uncomfortably close to racism and I know you didn’t mean it that way.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthi_movement

      • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good points each of them, and it’s why I wonder if the US might move to conclude some of them, rather than have them nagging on .

          • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Was about to say the same thing.

            Unless they want to keep grinding Putin by proxy, Big Z might be not be getting his calls returned.

      • uSpetzWon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The problem so far has been that “more violence” has not been “enough violence”. Apply enough and there will be a peace.