(Reuters) - Canada on Sunday announced a two-year extension to a ban on foreign ownership of Canadian housing, saying the step was aimed at addressing worries about Canadians being priced out of housing markets in cities and towns across the country.

Canada is facing a housing affordability crisis, which has been blamed on an increase in migrants and international students, fueling demand for homes just as rising costs have slowed construction.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    If both corporate ownership and amateur landlords are banned, then doesn’t that severely limit what a landlord can be?

    I mean, that might not be a bad idea…

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      For single family homes - yes! I’m fine with corporate ownership of purpose built units. We need way more of them, and the idea that “mom and pop” investors would fill that void is silly.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think the differentiator should be corporate versus “mon and pop” landlords, but rather single family homes versus multi family buildings.

        In my view, single family dwellings should generally be owned by the occupant, with very few, very rare exceptions.