• jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, they started out by killing entire villages to take their houses. The whole Zionist project was built on blood.

      • phreekno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        its never been livestreamed like this though. people are seeing this happen in real-time. instead of taking days to even years to reach people, its getting to us in our hand in minutes if not seconds.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, it shouldn’t have been in your 2024 bingo card because it’s been a yearly ordeal for decades

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s been a century at this point, hasn’t it? I’m pretty sure the British mandate was like in 1920 or something. Though at no point has it been this kind of Hitler shit until now.

        • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m pretty one sided on this topic, and I’m sorry if my first comment was hyperbolic as well as one-sided. That said, Is what you’re saying:

          If Israel starves Palestinians in a ghetto they can’t escape, that qualifies as Hitler shit

          If so, then I have to ask if the process of Palestinians being forced into ghettos they can’t escape, in their own lands, qualifies as Hitler shit?

          I truly think Israel has always been this cruel. The only thing that’s changed is it’s a lot harder to hide something from the Internet.

          Also, not like 80 years of colonialism is that different from 100, but the colonies that eventually formed into the nation of Israel were called “British Palestine”. When Israel was formed in 1948, this was well after the UN had operated under the imperative that “[the recently discovered] Nukes are dangerous, but the new world order isn’t evil because we can use this power to preserve countries’ borders”

          Also, I’m not saying anything nice about the Eastern block. I hold the opinion western intervention was okay in scenarios like Vietnam, because before capitalist imperialists and even communist imperialists, there were Japanese imperialists destabilizing that region

          • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nah, starving in ghettos is not that uncommon for a country with a second class population. Going for an extermination of that population would qualify as “Hitler shit”.

            I think up until recently Israel has been content with just stealing land and forcing locals into worse and worse situation with the hopes that they will either die or flee on their own. Now they just ampted it up to causing a full blown famine there to starve anyone who can survive the bombing and their military.

            • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              When Israelis couldn’t subjugate the city of Haifa, they completely destroyed it and built a new city with the same name on top.

              Theyve been doing Hitler shit for decades, is it really the case that America’s longest, oldest war in the east is our most righteous?

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know how much of the news to believe, but I’m not really on board with all this indiscriminate killing.

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve been to Israel a number of times and have several good friends there. I don’t know what to do, really. They would be the ones protesting against Netanyahu, rather than the ones raving in the way of an aid convoy.

        The first thing I said after the attacks last October, other than “are my friends okay”, was literally “fuck, the response is going to be completely disproportionate”. They’ve got a fucking horrible government and there’s an undercurrent of nasty, nationalist Israelis, including literal Jewish supremacists.

        I’m not an antisemite - my best friends genuinely are Jewish, that’s not a smokescreen. I’ve been shown more kindness by Jews in my life than by my own family. But I’d say, on balance, I am anti those particular semites. And I think a large percentage of Jews also are. I know my friends will casually say things about the ultra-orthodox community that I definitely can’t repeat.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          More Jews live outside Israel than in Israel. Being against the Israeli government doesn’t make you an antisemite.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Israel is not a majoritarian state. Very few Palestinians are allowed to vote or get any proper representation in government. How can they be ruled by a majority without even the right to vote?? It’s no different than when women and blacks couldn’t vote in elections in the US, and it’s no diffenrent than south Africa.

              But does that phase you one bit? Nope.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The “response” has been disproportionate for 60+ years.

          At what point are they no longer “responding” and move on to become the aggressors? Because the balance of power there shifted a very long time ago.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          They’ve got a fucking horrible government and there’s an undercurrent of nasty, nationalist Israelis, including literal Jewish supremacists.

          Let me just say: It’s not an undercurrent. The right wing in Israel has been dominant for a long time and is growing. I understand you want to distinguish yourself from Antisemites, but their government is accurately representing their constituents. It’s just that more than half their constituents see nothing wrong with genociding Muslims for Lebensraum.

          • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            70% of eligible voters voted.
            the current government’s parties were voted in by 49.5% of those voters.
            out of those, 14.13% were ultra-orthodox parties who always go with bibi because he gives them everything they want. about half of those are non-zionist.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not really on board with all this indiscriminate killing

      VERY controversial opinion! It’s a good thing this is a safe space where saying such things won’t cost you your livelihood!

      • bobalot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’m not really on board with killing so many children and starving 2.4 million people to death.

        Does that make me antisemitic?

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not according to sane people, no. According to unhinged mecha-zionists on the other hand…

          Ironically, equating the actions of the Israeli government with all of Jewdom is itself EXTREMELY antisemitic.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ironically, equating the actions of the Israeli government with all of Jewdom is itself EXTREMELY antisemitic.

            Which is why a typical Israeli’s participation in any political argument starts with attempting to show that logic doesn’t belong there.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hey now, far from all Israelis agree with the actions of their government… they got 49.5% of the vote with 70% voter participation. That’s 34.3% of the eligible to vote Israelis and an even smaller portion of the total population.

              Granted, it’s still FAR too many votes for a fascist apartheid regime, but my point is that far from all Israelis are the unhinged zionists we’re discussing…

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                OK, typical politically-active-in-the-web Israeli, which is the same thing as paid bot.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    Biden is really going to let Trump become president again because he won’t take serious action.

    The US is literally the reason the UN can’t do anything.

    All you had to do was not be pro genocide Biden. It’s such a low fucking bar and that geriatric fuck just can’t meet it.

    And whether Biden wins or loses, millions will suffer because he was the only other option than trump we were allowed to have.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I watched Jon Stewarts piece about Israel Palestine and he joked about how the UN can’t get anything done with absolutely no mention that it is everyone voting for a ceasefire and the USA voting to veto everything.

      It isn’t the UN that is doing nothing, it is the veto rules that allows the USA and other countries to throw out the collective good in order to protect empire.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Weird…

        I remember him mentioning it in both his recent episodes.

        Pretty sure he even mentioned how when the US vetos something like this, we always send a Black person to do the veto. But that bit might have been from somewhere else.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s what I’ve been trying to tell people for almost two decades: the UN isn’t inherently ineffective, but the Big 5 makes it so by vetoing almost every important resolution.

        If we take away that veto and grant the UN real enforcement power, it could make the world a much better place for the vast majority of humanity.

        The 5 and the billionaires whose interests align with them would never permit such justice, though 😮‍💨

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          If we take away that veto and grant the UN real enforcement power, it could make the world a much better place for the vast majority of humanity.

          I like to dream too, but if you remove the veto and give the UN enforcement powers, the UN would dissolve damned near overnight. The big players play because they can control the narrative and know that the UN is effectively toothless. You give them teeth and you’re going to see every right wing party in the world lose their shit about sovereignty or rev even harder at the derp state.

          Now, that’s not to say it’s a bad idea at all. In fact I agree with you that it should be done. I just have no faith that the necessary changes wouldn’t also destroy it.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s called the Security Council, and if it didn’t exist, we would have nuked ourselves into dust at this point.

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is just false info. It exists to keep public record of communication.

          All the nuclear powers talk to each other all the time without any need for the UN. US and Russia even have a direct land line to each other.

    • nihilvain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      As if there wasn’t enough hatred towards USA from the Middle East, these actions are showing seeds of hatred towards USA for generations to come. Which can be easily radicalized in the future.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s why it’s always bullshit that we “need” a close ally there.

        We dont. Especially when that “ally” just constantly instigates conflict then drags us into it to back them up.

        If we weren’t propping up Israel and going after oil, most people in the Middle East wouldn’t give two shits about the West.

        And without the instability it all causes, there’d be less far right religious extremists running shit. And everyone’s lives would be better off

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Removed, rule 5:

        “Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’ll never stop being surprising when Biden supporters sound indistinguishable than trump voters.

        As Michelle Obama said:

        Be better

        Quick edit:

        Also weird how I always get replies from these brand new accounts after blocking trolls and they keep replying and I stop replying…

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your comment was an adorable attempt at sowing division. If you’re really prepared to not vote and let Trump win because you don’t like Biden’s messaging, that’s a you problem (and by extension, becomes everyone else’s problem too).

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        With all due respect, which is none, fuck off with that false dichotomy.

        They didn’t say that they weren’t going to vote, they said that they were worried that Biden will lose because he’s doing things that people hate and refusing to do things that people need.

        It’s the job of a politician to earn votes. It’s not the job of voters to meekly fall in line as long as the other candidate is worse.

        Yours is the kind of condescending ideological cowardice that got us to this awful point in the first place.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s the job of a politician to earn votes. It’s not the job of voters to meekly fall in line as long as the other candidate is worse.

          And that’s the core of it right there. Why would I vote for someone who has done nothing to earn my vote?

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        We just saw grassroots Muslims & allies in Michigan organize a 13% protest vote of ‘Undecided’ in the state’s Democratic primary. They aren’t alt-right trolls shitposting hot takes, that is a lot of real people who are absolutely FURIOUS that an administration they supported in 2020 has taken so little actual action on this matter

        I also completely disagree that a personal voting choice should be seen as the ‘bad guy’ when the DNC did all it could to stifle challengers to Biden. Get angry at them and their political duopoly, not voters with conviction

        If Biden came out and said “As a devout Catholic I cannot morally support abortion, I will not work to restore Roe v Wade protections” he would be rightly criticized heavily, and people would likely choose to note vote based on that

          • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You got a source for that claim, or are you just parroting the DNC’s party line here? I didn’t find anything even implying this was astroturfed when searching

              • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Responsible? No.

                Able to stop the bloodshed? Very likely so, if he has the willpower. And they are trying to push on him to take concrete action. Abstaining from using UNSC veto is an easy lever he can pull as head of the Executive branch, as is using the ‘bully pulpit’ to criticize Israel’s actions and highlight the behavior of the extremists in the Likud coalition cabinet. Neither require congress or the courts, just the will to act

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  He doesn’t have the willpower and I don’t think anyone else in Washington really does, either.

                  A ceasefire, to me anyway, means Hamas remains the de facto leadership of Gaza, they get to keep whatever is left of their tunnels and weapons, and their fighters just have to lay low for a while before they go on fighting, which means more decades of Hamas terror attacks on innocent civilians, rocket attacks, kidnappings, more mass shootings of innocent’s and fitedt responders, maybe we’ll be back to their days of suicide bombings, and more decades of Israeli airstrikes in response. That cannot be allowed to happen, terrorists don’t get to have their own state. Biden knows that. Hamas can either surrender or be killed or imprisoned, then there can be a ceasefire.

      • phreekno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        don’t like Biden’s messaging

        but that message is he’s not willing to call a permanent unconditional ceasefire and is willing to let more children die. am i supposed to like that message?

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, like 99% of Americans don’t care about Gaza enough to not vote for Biden over Trump. The internet echo chamber has warped your sense of what normal people actually care about.

      • moe93@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think you underestimate the Arab/Muslim population in the US who stopped believing in “blue no matter who” because of what is happening.

        Also on a side note, what do normal people care about? I’d argue if you don’t care about the fact that a Holocaust level genocide is taking place then you aren’t really that normal.

        • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’d argue if you don’t care about the fact that a Holocaust level genocide

          17 million people died in the holocaust. IRC the population of Gaza is roughly 2.4 million of which just over 1% have died. That figure includes Hamas militants. The Gaza Health Ministry does not distinguish between combatant and civilian casualties in its reports.

          It is possible to criticize and condemn Israeli war crimes and ethnic cleansing, which are without doubt horrific, without distorting the facts.

          In fact, it actually makes your criticism more convincing and harder to discount by supporters of the current hard right Israeli government. The fediverse is a bubble on this conflict, but we should be aware that hyperbole does not serve the interests of the Palestinian cause or win the argument outside of this bubble.

          Maybe you’ll be the exception, but I say this knowing full well that some will call me pro-Israel for this comment. But if anything these extremists are useful idiots for Israel’s far right government and its supporters, as they allow them to paint any criticism as anti-semitism or disingenious.

          e: this comment already had downvotes within seconds of me posting it. This is not long enough to finishing reading it…

          • moe93@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            While I appreciate your thoughtful response, I disagree with the fact that we need to wait for 17million Palestinians murdered before we can liken the current genocide to the Holocaust.

            The way I see it, the Holocaust was/is attributed to the systematic cleansing and expulsion of an ethnic group at a mass scale and not measured by the number of murdered people (not death, murder because that’s what it is).

            You can call it whatever you want, but at the end of the day what is happening in Palestine is an ethnic cleansing at a mass scale similar to the Holocaust.

            • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              The comment I replied to said:

              a Holocaust level genocide is taking place

              30,000 people have died. 17 million people died in the holocaust. That is not on the same level and it is not on the same scale. 30,000 is a significantly smaller number than 17 million.

              If you support the Palestinian cause, pretending otherwise is a home goal.

              I get that it feels right, because people are understandably angry about all this, but it’s not a winning argument. Quite the opposite. If you’re provably exaggerating the scale of what’s happening, it allows supporters of Israel’s far right government to sow doubt and claim you might also be exaggerating about the very very real war crimes and ethnic cleansing they are engaged in.

              • moe93@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I feel like you and I are NOT on the same page, as a matter of fact, I feel like we are arguing to different points.

                You seem like you are gatekeeping the definition of the Holocaust based on number of murdered casualties, I argue that the act of ethnically cleansing the Palestinian people is comparable to the Holocaust.

                Please don’t create another straw man to argue over, the number of casualties was never the point, rather the act itself.

                • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I argue that the act of ethnically cleansing the Palestinian people is comparable to the Holocaust.

                  Your comment above:

                  if you don’t care about the fact that a Holocaust level genocide

                  Maybe you misunderstood my criticism, but I wasn’t disputing that what was happening was genocide or ethnic cleansing. I was disputing the level or scale of what was happening. Clearly what is happening in Gaza (and the West Bank) is on a smaller scale. 17 million vs. 30,000 in Gaza.

                  This doesn’t make what is happening ok. It just means that it is on a smaller scale than the holocaust.

                  Please don’t create another straw man to argue over, the number of casualties was never the point

                  This is not another argument. The number of casualties was my argument from the beginning. The number of casualties may not have been your point, but it was mine when you said that what was happening was on the same level or scale as the holocaust.

                  This is also not a strawman argument. I am literally adressing something you said in your comment.

                  On a more general note, this is why comparisons to the Nazis or the Holocaust are rarely helpful, and partly why Godwin’s law is a thing.

                  For example, just because someone isn’t Adolf Hitler or a Nazi, doesn’t mean they’re not a fascist. Calling someone like Ben Gvir or Smotrich a Nazi might feel good, but it allows them to say “Aha! But I don’t believe x, y, z. Also, the Nazis hated Jews. I’m a Jew. So you’re wrong.” It undermines your argument, even if they are quite similar to Nazis. Call them a fascist or racial supremacist, based on things that they actually said and did, and it’s far harder to deny.

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making a region ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal such as deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction.

                Capturing 78% of Palestine in 1948, followed by colonizing and taking control of 60-88% of the West Bank for a total of 91-97% of all of Historic Palestine; dispossessing millions of Palestinians while violently maintaining an apartheid under permanent occupation isn’t doing a good job to you?

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Unfortunately, we can’t go back in time. Second-guessing Israel’s creation and settlement by Jews does literally nothing to address the current problem.

                  October 7 changed the calculus: the tunnels have to be destroyed now and Hamas cannot continue to remain in charge. It is Hamas who built the tunnels under people’s homes and it is Hamas who encourages people to ignore their own safety and stay in harm’s way so that they can be killed as proud Martyrs.™

                  Hamas should surrender right now and bring the violence to an end but it won’t. The West certainly isn’t going to demand a ceasefire, that’s a courtesy we might extend to a state power in a political settlement of the war, but not to literal terrorists that only recently stopped using suicide bombers.

                  The death toll is horrifying but I blame Hamas for these numbers. It’s why they built the tunnels under people’s houses in the first place, it’s called using human shields. Then, Hamas acts all shocked Pikachu, “why would the IDF do this?!,” which is called lawfare.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I see the denial is kicking in even stronger. The uglier Israel’s crimes are, the more pathetic your excuses and analysis.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That dude’s denial runs so deep. I’m just glad there are others like you that debunk the Israeli propaganda and dehumanization of Palestinians.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Anyone call this a Holocaust level genocide is an absolute moron.

              What about these guys?

              Holocaust survivors who are anti-Zionist:

              • Hajo Meyer

                Meyer repeatedly argued that there are parallels between the Nazi treatment of Jews leading to (but not including) the Holocaust, and Israel’s dehumanization of Palestinians.

              • Marione Ingram

                Ingram says experiencing anti-Jewish hate, losing family members to the Nazi killing machine and surviving the Allied bombing of Hamburg as a child all inspire her to speak out for peace. “What Israel is doing will not end this conflict. It will only exacerbate it,” says Ingram.

              • Tal Frieden, grandchild of a Holocaust survivor

                The rally was loud in its claim that Israel has the unconditional support of the U.S. government. But the U.S. people do not support Israel’s attack on Gaza, which Holocaust scholars have deemed a genocide.

              • Elliot Kukla, another grandchild of a holocaust survivors

                My father was also deprived of medical care as a child, and that legacy scarred him for life physically and psychologically. While he was in hiding, he got sick with whooping cough; the sound of his coughing threatened his own life and the life of the family who sheltered him from Nazis. To spare everyone, he was taken to a Catholic orphanage in the countryside of Belgium.

              • Seven other holocaust survivors likening the treatment of Palestinians to the treatment of Jews by Nazi Germany. I’m excluding Hajo Meyer since I already listed him and Gabor Mate because somehow him being only 1 year old during the holocaust and not a resident of Israel makes him “not real enough to comment on such issues” for some people

              • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                What about these guys? … Meyer repeatedly argued that there are parallels between the Nazi treatment of Jews leading to (but not including) the Holocaust, and Israel’s dehumanization of Palestinians.

                ???

                Ie. Meyer is explicitly NOT arguing that it is comparable to the holocaust, but only to the treatment of Jews leading up to the Holocaust.

                • ???@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I invite you to read the later career section. Some of it:

                  In his last recorded interview, coinciding with the 2014 Israel-Gaza Conflict, he lambasted Zionists as Nazi criminals, asserted that German hatred of Jews was less deeply grounded than Israeli-Jewish hatred of Palestinians, and denounced PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s remarks that demonstrations against the war were evidence of hatred of Israel.[citation needed] He was the first signatory of a statement by 250 Holocaust survivors and descendants of Holocaust survivors protesting that war.[19]

                  At one talk, organized and hosted by the leader of the UK’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, in 2010, Meyer was later reported to have repeatedly likened Israel’s actions against the people of the Gaza Strip to the mass killing of Jews in the Holocaust and likened the government of Israel to that of Nazi Germany.[14][15]

            • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Anyone call this a Holocaust level genocide is an absolute moron.

              You’re not entirely wrong, and I’m not accusing anyone here, but sometimes they’re not stupid. Sometimes they are doing it deliberately to disconcert and because they know it will be hurtful to survivors (most of whom weren’t Jewish, but I digress). Sometimes they’re being useful idiots and uncritically parroting that propaganda.

              Unfortunately a lot of anti-Israel propaganda does have explicitly anti-semitic undertones. For example, the Russian/Soviet inspired stuff. Twitter is also full of actual Nazis using this conflict for their own ends. It’s important for people who oppose what Israel is doing, to avoid adopting those anti-semitic undertones even if they’re justifiably angry, because it allows the Israeli far-right to paint all criticism of Israel as anti-semitic. It also alienates the many Jewish people who are critical of the Israeli government and how the Palestinians are treated.

              For example, saying “Zionists control all Western Media” plays into the trope of Jews controlling the media, and is easy to disprove. Obviously not all Jews are Zionists, but if you go on a website like StormFront, they’ll openly admit using Zionist as a dogwhistle for Jew. Hence, you’ll occasionally see an especially blatant comment which says something about ‘’‘Zionists’‘’ being cunning or the like. Plenty of western coverage is critical, which those who defend what Israel is doing will happily use to claim that there is no Zionist bias in Western coverage. Meanwhile if you don’t engage in hyperbole, and simply state that a lot of (but not all) western media are very often (but not always) biased(not fully controlled) in favour of Israel, that’s very hard to disprove because IMHO it’s largely true.

              But you’ve been heavily downvoted, I’ve been heavily downvoted above, and this comment will inevitably also be heavily downvoted too. The fediverse is a bit of a circlejerk like that.

              It’s not as if what we say will actually influence anything anyway, and we’re certainly not going to stop the killings. I participate in the fediverse to practice my English.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Uh… No? Polls have consistently shown that Biden is losing younger voters over this issue. And let’s not forget that there are multiple swing states (Michigan is just the most famous one) where losing Muslim votes is enough to cost Biden the state. Enough Americans care about Gaza to cost Biden the election.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah bro…

        The only reason to be upset with Biden is his support of Israel’s genocide…

        /s

        There’s also:

        1. What he wants to do with our border

        2. Pretending “the economy” is more about billionaires wealth and average Americans aren’t important

        3. Record breaking fossil fuels production

        4. Just ignoring the healthcare crisis

        And a shit ton of other things.

        Supporting Israel could very well be all you care about, but lots of people aren’t that simple.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you get to pick between no food, or half enough food to survive…

            How much effort would you put in to starve to death slower?

            Running a bad candidate depresses turnout. And depressed turnout is the only way Republicans win.

            Running Joe Biden is the biggest factor that helps Trump’s chances of winning, and there’s zero fucking reason we’re handing it to him.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              The vast majority of people will choose half food for the chance to live until more food is available. There is not another candidate from the Dems that has the national recognition as Biden, or the successes that Biden should be doing a better job of selling, that could take his place at this point in time.

              Yes, I would rather they ran someone else. But with half the voting population all in on wish.com Hitler it is necessary to eat half the food now and hope for a better candidate next time.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                9 months ago

                Except we only get a presidential election every four years, and not everyone will still be alive then

                That’s not even part of the starvation example.

                Literally people you’re asking to pick the lesser evil right now will die because of that lesser evil before the 2028 election.

                Maybe you’re upper middle class and it’s not a big deal.

                Congrats, you’re a very small percentage of Americans and the total votes Biden needs to win.

                If you want to help Biden, try having some empathy for the less fortunate and start screaming your head off at the Dem party while there’s time.

                • snooggums@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  We should absolutely give Biden grief up until November when we need to grit our teeth and accept aomething less than perfection to vote against the Republicans who are worse on every single topic.

                  It isn’t like Biden is the only Democrat who is supporting Israel. How many Dems are passing the funding legislation that Biden signs? Who are they going to put up instead of him that opposes Israel?

                  Nobody.

                  Biden is the best that the party can put forth right now, and we should give him grief to get him to change. The action agsinst Biden in the primaries is great!

                  But come November it will be critical to vote against Trump, and a vote for anything other than a Democrat is a vote for Trump because of our stupid voting system.

            • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              Stop letting perfect being they enemy of good enough. This line of thinking you’re engaging in will only accelerate Trump’s victory. Unless the finality of the United States is your goal, you may want to come up with a more apt analogy.

  • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Damn. War is hell. I blame the Hamas terrorists that brought this upon the Palestinian people.