There really aren’t any alternatives. At least nothing as all-encompassing as those two
I stand by that Wikipedia is truly the greatest site on the entire Internet, no real reason to create a competitor when you can download the entirety of it for free
I think the next step down from Wikipedia is an actual encyclopedia. Also news websites for archives.
What are your concerns with these sites?
deleted by creator
Just don’t go on articles you don’t want to see?
I’m curious as to what content you don’t approve of specifically.
deleted by creator
Care to elaborate?
deleted by creator
Specifically what is your problem with those? You haven’t really explained anywhere in the thread. It’s kinda relevant for knowing what to recommend.
deleted by creator
They aren’t really good at giving facts and information compared to what I want to believe.
I read the Bible for a living and would like to believe in that or anything about the Bible rather than go down an Internet rabbit-hole.
I can actually offer you a resource that might help. It isn’t precisely what you’re after, but it is a Christian non-profit organization that seeks to mend the gap between science and faith, and let people know they can live in both worlds. They have some great resources.
Good luck, man, but my advice? Maybe consider shifting some of your positions to fit the real world.
The way I see it, in Christianity God has spoken to us in two categories: His Word and His Creation.
To reject what we learn about His Creation due to our interpretation of His Word is the epitome of hubris.
I had a discussion once with a friend of mine who is a Lutheran pastor. I mentioned that the evidence for evolution and an old earth/universe is incontrovertible. And this was a shock to him, because I had previously been a pretty staunch Young Earth advocate in my younger, more ignorant years.
He asked me how I square various things from the Bible with that, and he was a bit troubled by my response:
“You’re the pastor, you tell me how to square it.” As in, I’m telling you something that I have more expertise in than you do. Rather than denying it, please use your theological expertise to help bridge this gap.
Because continuing to push strict interpretations of scripture against the realities of the world we live in has never served the Church. Ever. Galileo being declared a heretic for his heliocentric theory is really no different than denying modern scientific discoveries. Even now it only harms the Church, leads to people having crises of faith or abandoning the Church altogether because in far too many churches a dogmatic, rigid understanding of Scripture is more important than the Gospel itself.
This is why I admire churches that are open and affirming, preaching the Gospel to sinners, rather than using the Law as a way to shame and exclude. For all have sinned and fallen short, no one is better or worse than another.
Christ ate with prostitutes, criminals, and tax collectors. The Church needs to be more like Christ.
I guess I got a bit off topic at the end there, but I hope I helped in some way. To me it’s all intertwined.
Speaking as a mildly militant atheist, this is some of the smartest shit I’ve ever seen a religious adherent say.
Thank you, I consider that a distinct honor and high praise!
deleted by creator
… wow. Best of luck with that.
Best bet is probably a book.
Kinda annoying to have to deal with updates though…
Is there an issue with these sites I’m not aware of?
Jimmy Wales is a shitbag, but that just means I don’t give Wikipedia any money.
I am barely aware of TV Tropes.
A shit bag how?
He’s a Randroid.
Ok, how about we try normal English and preferably some sources? I don’t know what that word means or why it should be significant to anyone.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales
Personal philosophy section.
Wales has previously referred to himself as an Objectivist, referring to the philosophy of writer Ayn Rand
Everyone here is welcome to disagree with my assertion that he’s a shitty human being, but that is my read of the situation.
deleted by creator
I don’t boycott Wikipedia. I just don’t give them any money. I don’t give lots of websites any money. I will give them money when he’s no longer a part of the board.
Wikipedia is a great resource started by a terrible person. I recommend people use it.
deleted by creator
I was afraid of that, but given some of your previous posts, I’m not all that surprised.
Since both those sites are just descriptions of things that exist, it sounds like you want an echo chamber where you don’t need to acknowledge that certain things exist. I think it’s better to try and figure out why you’re so offended by reality.
I don’t know if it’s good yet, but I think one of the Lemmy devs is trying to make a federated Wikipedia. I honestly don’t see the need for it, but it’s his time and if he wants to work on it, great. I wish him well.
deleted by creator
AllTheTropes
TVTropes but with a very boring game of blackjack
https://www.reddit.com/r/tvtropes/comments/c0n9rh/all_the_tropes/
archive.org is great for borrowing old books, that you probably can’t get your hands on otherwise. Just need a bit of research following references to find titles to search for.
Everything2.org was a significant wikipedia competitor back in the early 00s. It’s still up but I havent been there in a decade and a half. Could be worth your time, it was interesting to get lost in back in the Web 1.0 days