• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    They devs say the knew of the requirement from Sony and it was also part of the store requirement since it was listed, so why would they list it for sale in those countries? It seems Steam should have some limitation in place on their end, and the Dev picks sales on Steam, not the publisher.

    Theres shit to go to everyone here, not just Sony in this case. And no one seems to want to accept personal responsibility for not reading the game requirements and ignoring the splash screen when you first loaded the game. Everyone who bought and missed all the warning flags should also take a look back at themselves before complaining about something that was always going to be required and was at the very start at launch.

    • August27th@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Did the CEO of Sony write this? A bait and switch scam is fine apparently, as long as there’s some legalese to protect the company in there.

      It seems Steam should have some limitation in place on their end, and the Dev picks sales on Steam, not the publisher.

      Then what is the job of the publisher? To perpetrate scams it seems, because seemingly the devs published the game just fine all by themselves to Steam. If they didn’t do that right, the publisher suddenly has no responsibility to make sure that was distributed correctly? Whose job is it to ensure the product is published in line with their inevitable goals, we wonder.

      so why would they list it for sale in those countries?

      Because they botched the bait and switch. And now Valve is cleaning up Sony’s mess. Too bad they couldn’t clean up Sony’s mess of leaked customer data. I guess they can’t fix it but prevent the next one by making publishers agree up front that they can’t require data from players, in order to publish a game, but I digress.

      no one seems to want to accept personal responsibility

      No one should have to expect to be subject to a bait and switch scam in the first place. Which is what this clearly is, because if they were truly up front, they would have required the account on day one and had the appropriate region filters in place, so consumers could never be in this position.

      Stop blaming the victims of corporate greed and scams; people should be able to reasonably enjoy things they paid for without being molested and exploited. Personal responsibility my ass when there should be laws to prevent this kind of thing in the first place.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Steam and arrowhead both allowed the sale of the game in non-compatible markets.

        Everyone is to blame in, it all depends on how you want to swing it.

        I’m not defending any single entity, I literally blamed them all lmfao.

        But of course someone is a shill when they go against your bias and narrative…. Give your head a fucking shake.

        Sony ripped you off here, so did Steam and so did arrowhead. Arrowhead is kind of being the worst here throwing everyone else under the bus instead of owning up to their mistake and sever lack of communication though. They are trying a strong arm tactic now that they got caught with their own hand in the jar.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Steam and arrowhead both allowed the sale of the game in non-compatible markets.

          No. Sony handles the publishing on Steam. Sony set the countries allowed for sale – neither Steam, which is only the platform, nor arrowhead, who did not publish the game, have any responsibility in the matter. You’re taking away blame from Sony which is the single culprit for that mistake

        • August27th@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          against your bias and narrative

          If being a regular person who just wants to enjoy the things they pay for in peace is bias, and being fed up with this crap is narrative, what does that make you?

          Stop trying to normalize exploitation by greed, and stop normalizing the acceptance of it.

          Just because Sony can manufacture a bait and switch with some boilerplate doesn’t mean they should. Regular people should not be blamed for being exploited when purchasing in good faith. The developers made a game that works, clearly, and Steam delivered it, so they are culpable, but if Sony can stop their horseshit, and this all goes away, it is clear who really is to blame.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      and the Dev picks sales on Steam, not the publisher.

      Do you happen to have a source for this? It was my understanding that the publisher handled all distribution. Hence the name. And if I’m wrong, I’d like to fix my misunderstanding.

    • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I never even had the option to skip linking accounts. Granted I bought the game within the first few weeks of release.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Open minded but not sure I agree: is it really on the consumers to ensure that a product won’t completely stop working for them?