• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s true, you cannot target civilians. But you can destroy a military objective even if you know it will kill civilians. Per ICC:

    Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives, even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur.

    “Eliminate every human” is not a valid objective, but “eliminate Hamas” is.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Possibly, but the civilian-combatant casualty ratios so far seem to be in keeping with proportionality.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Even if they somehow were accurate, these numbers only cover the direct deaths from attacks, the totals you cite include all deaths from starvation and disease and more. The attacks on the hospital system and infrastructure and access to food will cause the ratio to get much much worse. Famine is indiscriminate.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I can only assess the numbers I have. If in the future they drastically change for the worse, then I will reassess.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I can’t find any source showing the context of the 30-35% claim from US Intel. I can’t even find a reliable source of the US estimate of how many fighters they have. The last public numbers from US intel in January had much more detail and said 20% incapacitated, not 20% dead. A jump to +30% of Hamas fighters dead now seems beyond implausible. Especially because USA has also said they don’t independently track deaths in the region, they rely on local numbers.

              Different Hamas officials have made different claims about their losses, and all the sources seems vague. It’s been reported as 6000 - 8000 either lost (could be casualties including injured survivors not able to fight) or dead. And some of them deny the numbers entirely.

              https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/in-gaza-authorities-lose-count-of-the-dead-779ff694

              It’s absolutely not the 15K that IDF claims.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                The last public numbers from US intel in January had much more detail and said 20% incapacitated, not 20% dead.

                I don’t think so, this is from your January link (my emphasis):

                security forces have killed just 20-30 percent of the terror group’s terrorists in the Gaza Strip, US intelligence agencies are reportedly estimating.

                The wounded are counted separately.